Article review
Every article sent is estimated by the Editorial Board member who checks whether the article research meets the basic criteria and standards of the Bulletin. In case of a positive decision, the manuscript is under the bilateral “blind” review during which reviewers and authors remain anonymous.
According to the review results the article can be:
1. Accepted. The article which received two positive reviews will be included into the list of the Bulletin publications with the status “accepted”;
2. Revised and resent. If both reviews are positive, but contain reviewers’ remarks and comments they are sent to the authors for further revision;
If the article receives one positive review whereas the other one is negative, and the Editorial Board considers the results to be significant, then this article is sent to authors for revision.
If authors are determined not to agree with reviewers’ opinion and refuse to revise the article, it receives the status “rejected”.
3. The article is rejected if it receives two negative reviews.
Authors must take into account recommendations of reviewers and correct any mistakes.
Editorial improvements are sent for authors’ approval. After that the approved text of the article is formatted and typeset.
The final version of the typeset article is approved by authors.
After approval the layout receives the status “for publication” and included into the list of “Scientifiс Information Bulletin of Ivano-Frankivsk University of Law named after King Danylo Halytskyi”.