Zhukevych I. Foreign experience of judicial control over the enforcement of decisions in civil judiciary

DOI: 10.33098/2078-6670.2021.12.24.127-132

Purpose. The aim of the work is to analyze judicial control over the implementation of decisions in civil proceedings of foreign countries, to identify the mechanism of judicial control over the implementation of decisions in civil proceedings, to determine the most effective measures to implement foreign judicial control in civil proceedings of Ukraine. Method. The methodology includes a comprehensive analysis and generalization of existing scientific and theoretical material of judicial control in foreign countries and the formulation of relevant conclusions and recommendations for its further practical implementation in civil proceedings in Ukraine. The following methods of scientific cognition were used during the research: terminological, logical-semantic, functional, system-structural, logical-normative. Results. In the course of the study it was recognized that judicial control in Ukraine is applied only in the case of appeals against decisions, acts and omissions of executors. Despite its formal consolidation, it will be effective in the case of the introduction of a real mechanism of its application, taking into account the positive experience of foreign countries. Scientific novelty. In the course of the research it was established that updating of theoretical and methodological bases of introduction of judicial control over execution of decisions in civil proceedings of Ukraine should take into account positive foreign experience of its functioning in the following countries: England, USA, Poland, Germany, France. decisions are an integral part of the activities of the judiciary. Practical significance. The results of the study can be used in lawmaking and law enforcement activities during the judicial control in the civil process of Ukraine.

Key words: judicial control, execution of court decisions, civil proceedings, enforcement proceedings, foreign experience.

References

1. Verba, O. B. (2008). Poperednii ta podalshyi sudovyi zakhyst u vykonavchomu provadzhenni za zakonodavstvom Ukrainy ta Polshchi [Preliminary and further judicial protection in enforcement proceedings under the laws of Ukraine and Poland]. Naukovyi visnyk Lvivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav. Seriia yurydychna: zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Lviv: LvDUVS, 1. pp. 111–119. (in Ukrainian)

2. Verba, O. B. (2006). Rol sudu u vykonavchomu provadzhenni za zakonodavstvom Ukrainy ta zarubizhnykh krain [The role of the court in enforcement proceedings under the laws of Ukraine and foreign countries]. Problemy derzhavotvorennia i zakhystu prav liudyny v Ukraini: materialy XII rehionalnoi naukovo-praktychnoi  konferentsii (9–10 liutoho 2006 r.). (pp. 467–469). Lviv: Yurydychnyi fakultet Lvivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka. (in Ukrainian)

3. Rolskie Kodeksu. Kodeks rostęrowania suwilnego. Retrieved from: httr://rrawo.legeo.rl/rrawo /kodeks-rosterowania-suwilnego-z-dnia-17-listorada-1964-r/- (data zvernennia 05.12.2021r.). (in Polish)

4. Banaszak, V. (2005). Kontrola. Mała Ensukloredia Prawa. Warszawa: Wudawnistwo S. H. Besk, 859 p. (in Polish)

5. Vasyliev, S. V. Porivnialnyi tsyvilnyi protses: pidruchnyk. K.: Alerta, 2015. 352 s. (in Ukrainian)

6. Verba, O. (2008). Povnovazhennia sudu ta inshykh orhaniv na stadii prymusovoho vykonannia rishen za zakonodavstvom Nimechchyny [Powers of the court and other bodies at the stage of enforcement of decisions under German law]. Visnyk Lviv. un-tu. Seriia yurydychna, 46, p. 107. (in Ukrainian)