Deineha M. Recognition of land ownership as a civil law method of rights protection

DOI: 10.33098/2078-6670.2022.14.26.128-136

The purpose of the article is to analyze theoretical approaches and provisions of legal acts regarding the recognition of land ownership as a civil law method of protecting rights, to identify gaps and contradictions in national legislation and judicial practice that arise during the application of such a method of protection, as well as to develop proposals to the improvement of legislation on certain issues. The methodological basis of the research was the dialectical method of scientific knowledge, the general scientific (formal-logical, methods of analysis and synthesis) and the special-legal method (formal-legal). The scientific novelty lies in the fact that based on the analysis of doctrinal and normative sources, the article reveals gaps and contradictions in national legislation and judicial practice that arise when applying the recognition of property rights as a civil law method of protecting rights, and also develops proposals for improving the legislation from a specific issue. According to the results of the study, it was established that the recognition of the right of ownership is an effective way of civil legal protection of the right to land ownership, which is aimed at eliminating disputes and uncertainty of the content of the rights of the owner of a plot of land, ascertaining the existence of the right of ownership and its renewal, by creating legal opportunities for the realization of rights belonging to the owner land plot of powers. The practical significance of the article lies in the fact that the proposed changes to the civil and civil procedural legislation of Ukraine can be used in law-making activities with the aim of improving the regulatory framework in the field of civil law protection of rights.

Key words: ownership, land ownership, recognition of ownership, civil law protection of rights, jurisdictional forms of rights protection, methods of rights protection.

References

1.         Dzera, I.O. (2001). Tsyvilno-pravovi zasoby zakhystu prava vlasnosti Ukrainy [Civil legal means of protection of property rights of Ukraine]. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter. (in Ukrainian).

2.         Land Code of Ukraine (2001). Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2768-14#Text (in Ukrainian).

3.         Constitution of Ukraine (1996). Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text (in Ukrainian).

4.         Kulynych, O.P. (2016). Zakhyst prava pryvatnoi vlasnosti na zemliu: tsyvilno-pravovi aspekty [Protection of the right to private ownership of land: civil law aspects]. Vinnytsia: FOP Rohalska I.O. (in Ukrainian).

5.         Otrosh, I.M. (2012). Pravo vlasnosti na ob’iekty nerukhomosti za zakonodavstvom Ukrainy: okhorona ta zakhyst [Ownership of real estate according to the legislation of Ukraine: protection]. Kyiv. (in Ukrainian).

6.         Padun, R.V. (2014). Vyznannia prava yak sposib zakhystu tsyvilnykh prav ta interesiv [Recognition of law as a way to protect civil rights and interests]. Kyiv. (in Ukrainian).

7.         Panchenko, I.M. (2016). Vyznannia prava vlasnosti yak sposib zakhystu tsyvilnykh prav [Recognition of property rights as a way to protect civil rights. Odesa. (in Ukrainian).

8.         Peichev, K.P. (2011). Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar do Zemelnoho kodeksu Ukrainy [Scientific and practical commentary to the Land Code of Ukraine]. Kharkiv: Faktor, 472 (in Ukrainian).

9.         Prytyka, Yu.D. (2006). Problemy zakhystu tsyvilnykh prav ta interesiv u treteiskomu sudi [Problems of protection of civil rights and interests in the arbitration court]. Kyiv: In Yure, 633 (in Ukrainian).

10.       Protocol to the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1952). Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_535#Text (in Ukrainian).

11.        Romovska, Z.V. (2009). Problemy zakhystu prava vlasnosti fizychnoi osoby [Problems of protecting the property rights of an individual]. Visnyk Akademii advokatury Ukrainy, 2(15): 5–10 (in Ukrainian).

12.       Romovska, Z.V. (2005). Ukrainske tsyvilne pravo. Zahalna chastyna [Ukrainian civil law. General part]. Kyiv: Atika. (in Ukrainian).

13.       Horsheneva, V.M. (Ed.). (1985). Teoryia yurydycheskoho protsessa [Theory of the legal process]. Kharkov: Vyshcha shk. (in Russian).

14.       Kharytonov, Ye.O. & Kharytonova, O.I. (2008). Struktura prava vlasnosti ta yii vplyv na kontseptualni zasady yoho zakhystu v suchasnomu tsyvilnomu pravi Ukrainy. [The structure of property rights and its impact on the conceptual foundations of its protection in modern civil law of Ukraine]. Novyi Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy: problemni pytannia zastosuvannia: Vprovadzhennia novoho Tsyvilnoho kodeksu v Ukraini. Kyiv: Polihraf-Ekspres, 24–30 (in Ukrainian).

15.       Azimova, Ch.N., Prystupy, S.N., Ihnatenka, V.M. (Ed.). (2000). Tsyvilne pravo Ukrainy: Chastyna persha [Civil law of Ukraine: Part one]. Kharkiv: Pravo. (in Ukrainian).

16.       Borysova V.I., Baranova L.M., Biehova T.I. et al. (2011). Tsyvilne pravo [Civil law]. Kharkiv: Pravo. (in Ukrainian).

17.       Civil Code of Ukraine (2003). Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text (in Ukrainian).

18.       Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine (2004). Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618-15#Text (in Ukrainian).

19.       Shtanko, A. (2014). Efektyvnist vyznannia prava yak sposobu zakhystu mainovykh tsyvilnykh prav ta interesiv [The effectiveness of the recognition of the right as a way of protecting property civil rights and interests]. Naukovyi chasopys Natsionalnoi akademii prokuratury Ukrainy, 4: 200–211 (in Ukrainian).

20.       Yavorska, O.S. (2008). Pravove rehuliuvannia vidnosyn vlasnosti za tsyvilnym zakonodavstvom Ukrainy [Legal regulation of property relations under the civil law of Ukraine]. Kyiv: Atika. (in Ukrainian).