Mahnovskyi I. Theoretical and legal understanding of the essence of state development in the context of globalization

DOI: 10.33098/2078-6670.2022.14.26.46-57

Purpose. The purpose of the work is to highlight the essence and features of the development of the state in the context of globalization, as an inevitable process in the latest conditions of world coexistence, in the theoretical and legal aspect. Methodology. The methodology includes a comprehensive analysis and generalization of the available scientific and theoretical material and the formulation of relevant conclusions and recommendations. The following methods of scientific cognition were used during the research: critical-dialectical, systemic, functional, abstraction, prognostic. Results. In the research process, it was recognized that, undoubtedly, globalization realities play an important role in ensuring the proper regulatory arrangement of multifaceted social relations based on international legal standards developed by the global progressive community. Of course, onecannot do without the absorption of certain national aspects of state formation as a result of integration processes in the latest conditions of global coexistence, and therefore, taking into account the challenges of globalization, in order to ensure and approve significantly important priority national criteria, it is advisable to develop relevant and adequate legal concepts of a binding nature. Originality. In the process of research, the content of globalization is substantiated as a complex multifaceted social process of a planetary scale, which exerts an inevitable influence on the essential characteristics of states in general and the formation and development of their institutions in particular, which have the property of changing under the pressure of the spread of worldwide advanced systems of socio-political, socio-economic, spiritual – of a cultural nature determined by international legal norms, thereby making it necessary to unite the efforts of national states in order to overcome common human problems. Practical significance. The results of the study can be used in: research work – for further scientific developments devoted to the impact of globalization on state-building processes; law-making and law-enforcement activities – for the preparation and improvement of domestic normative legal acts and for the fulfillment by states of international obligations.

Key words: state, national state, globalization, anti-globalism, supranational (suprastate) associations.

References

1. Oborotova, Ju. M. (Ed.). (2015). Kreatyvnistj zaghaljnoteoretychnoji jurysprudenciji [Creativity of general theoretical jurisprudence]. Odesa: Feniks. (in Ukrainian)

2. Atyjat, A. S. (2004). Vyzovy kulturnoj globalizacii dlya stran tretego mira [Challenges of cultural globalisation for the Third World]. Globalizaciya i multkulturalizm: doklady i vystupleniya VII Mezhdunar. filosofskaya konf. «Dialog civilizacij: Vostok-Zapad» (g. Moskva, 14–16 apr. 2003 g.). (22–25). Moskva: Sherbinskaya tipografiya. (in Russian)

3. Egbewole, W. O. (2003). Globalization and its challenges on national legal systems – a case study of Nigeria. Indian Journal of International World, 2, (Vol. 43), 330–348. (in English)

4. Udovyka, L. Gh. (2011). Transformacija pravovoji systemy v umovakh ghlobalizaciji: antropologhichnyj vymir [Transformation of the legal system in the context of globalization: anthropological dimension]. Kharkiv: Pravo. (in Ukrainian)

5. Ghumenjuk, B. I. (2008). Ukrajina v ghlobaljnomu sviti [Ukraine in the global world]. Zovnishnja polityka Ukrajiny: strateghichni ocinky, proghnozy ta priorytety. Kyjiv: VD «Stylos», 15–31. (in Ukrainian)

6. Featherstoune, M. (1990). Global Culture: An Introduction. Global Culture, Nationalism, Globalization and Modernity / ed. by M. Featherstoune. London: Sage, 1–15. (in English)

7. Khozyn, Gh. S. (1997). Ustojchivoe razvitie – novaya zadacha globalnyh peremen [Sustainable development – the new challenge of global change]. Globalnye socialnye i politicheskie peremeny v mire: materialy rossijsko-amerikanskoj konf. (g. Moskva, 23–24 oktyabrya 1996 g.). Moskva: FMS, 17–30. (in Russian)

8. Marchenko, M. N. (2008). Ghosudarstvo y pravo v uslovyjakh ghlobalyzacyy [State and law in a globalised world]. Moskva: Prospekt. (in Russian)

9. Osypov, Ju. M. (2002). Globalnaya ekonomika: ne mif, a realnost, hotya i transcendentnaya [The global economy: not a myth but a reality, albeit a transcendent one]. Filosofiya hozyajstva, 2 (20), 9–14. (in Russian)

10. Stecenko, S. Gh., Vasechko, L. O. (2011). Ghlobalizacija ta pravo: nacionaljnyj vymir [Globalization and law: national dimension]. Kyjiv: Atika. (in Ukrainian)

11. Osjmova, M. N. (2001). Gosudarstvo v epohu globalizacii [The state in an era of globalisation]. Globalizaciya mirovogo hozyajstva i evolyuciya ekonomicheskoj roli gosudarstva: materialy kruglogo stola (g. Moskva, 24 aprelya 2000 g.). Moskva: TEIS, 5–9. (in Russian)

12. Tykhomyrov, Ju. A., Pygholkyn, A. S. (Ed.). (2004). Ghlobalyzacyja y razvytye zakonodateljstva [Globalisation and legislative development]. Moskva: OAO «Yzdateljskyj dom «Ghorodec». (in Russian)

13. Lemak, V., Barysjka, Ja., Boldizhar, S. (2013). Vplyv ghlobalizaciji na formu pravlinnja suchasnoji derzhavy: do pytannja koryghuvannja obsjaghu ponjattja [The impact of globalization on the form of government of the modern state: to the issue of adjusting the scope of the concept]. Publichne pravo, 4 (12), 188–195. (in Ukrainian)

14. Myronenko, P. V. (2014). Forma pravlinnja: politychni transformaciji na zlami stolitj [Form of government: political transformations at the turn of the century]. Kyjiv: VC «Akademija». (in Ukrainian)

15. Ghidy Je. O. (Ed.). (2011). Teorija derzhavy ta prava [Theory of state and law]. Kyjiv: FOP O. S. Lipkan. (in Ukrainian)

16. Tolstenko, V. L. (2014). Forma derzhavnogho ustroju jak skladova ponjattja formy derzhavy: do metodologhiji doslidzhennja [The Form of State Structure as a Component of the Concept of the Form of State: Towards a Research Methodology]. Naukovi praci MAUP, 2 (41), 91–97. (in Ukrainian)

17. Kukhtyk, S. V. (2015). Transformation of the state under the influence of globalization (theoretical and legal aspect): PhD diss. Kyjiv. (in Ukrainian)

18. Bek, U. (2005). Dilemma demokratii v epohu globalizacii [The dilemma of democracy in an era of globalisation]. Aktualnye problemy Evropy: Dilemmy evropejskoj demokratii v nachale HHI stoletiya, 2, 24–45. (in Russian)

19. Marchenko, M. N. (2008). Problemy obshej teorii gosudarstva i prava [Problems of the general theory of state and law]. (Vol. 1). Moskva: TK Velbi, Izd-vo «Prospekt». (in Russian)

20. Romashov, R. A. (2010). Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Kratkij kurs. [Theory of State and Law. A short course]. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter. (in Russian)

21. Bjeljsjka, T. V. (2013). Ghlobalizacija jak faktor transformaciji vladno-suspiljnykh vidnosyn [Globalization as a factor of transformation of power and social relations]. Publichne upravlinnja: teorija i praktyka, 1, 72–78. (in Ukrainian)

22. Kuzenko, U. I. (2014). Politychna funkcija suchasnoji derzhavy: ponjattja, zmist, struktura [Political function of the modern state: concept, content, structure]. Naukovyj visnyk Uzhghorodsjkogho nacionaljnogho universytetu. Serija: «Pravo», 28, (Vol.1), 23–26. (in Ukrainian)

23. Danyljjana, O. Gh. (Ed.). (2018). Suspiljstvo, ljudyna, pravo: dosvid filosofsjko-pravovogho osmyslennja [Society, man, law: experience of philosophical and legal comprehension]. Kharkiv: Pravo. (in Ukrainian)

24. Spivak, V. M. (2011). Polityko-pravovyj ta sociokuljturnyj vymiry ghlobalizaciji [Political-legal and socio-cultural dimensions of globalization]. Kyjiv: Loghos. (in Ukrainian)

25. Bytjaka Ju. P., Jakovjuka I. V. (Ed.). (2010). Derzhavnyj suverenitet: teoretyko-pravovi problemy [State sovereignty: theoretical and legal problems]. Kharkiv: Pravo. (in Ukrainian)

26. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Retrived from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/cgi-bin/laws/main.cgi?nreg=995_118&p= 1309936688182142#Text (in Ukrainian) (data zvernennja: 22.11.2022)

27. Dzholos, S. V. (2012). Problema derzhavnogho suverenitetu v umovakh ghlobalizaciji: zaghaljnoteoretychnyj aspekt [The problem of state sovereignty in the context of globalization: general theoretical aspect]. Aktualjni problemy derzhavy i prava, 63, 56–54. (in Ukrainian)

28. Kujan, I. A. (2013). Suverenitet: problemy teoriji i praktyky: konstytucijno-pravovyj aspekt [Sovereignty: problems of theory and practice: constitutional and legal aspect]. Kyjiv: VC «Akademija». (in Ukrainian)

29. Oborotova, Yu. N. (Ed.). (2011). Obsheteoreticheskaya yurisprudenciya: uchebnyj kurs [General theoretical jurisprudence: a training course]. Odessa: Feniks. (in Russian)

30. Udovyka, L. Gh. (2011). Transformacija pravovoji systemy v umovakh ghlobalizaciji: antropologhichnyj vymir [Transformation of the legal system in the context of globalization: anthropological dimension]. Kharkiv: Pravo. (in Ukrainian)