Volobuyev A. Notice of suspicion: procedural significance and influence on the methodology of pre-trial investigation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33098/2078-6670.2024.18.30.139-146

The purpose of the article is to determine the essence of the notification of suspicion as an intermediate procedural decision; the possibility of its appeal by the defense; the impact of the notification of suspicion on the methodology of the pre-trial investigation. Methodology. In order to achieve the specified goal, an analysis of national criminal procedural legislation, court practice and scientific publications on the problematic issues of the notification of suspicion and the possibility of appealing it was carried out. Methods. The methods of dialectical, historical, comparative legal, etymological and semantic scientific research were used. Methods of logic (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, abstraction) were also used to determine common features and differences between the legal institutions of reporting suspicion and bringing charges, as well as investigative situations. Findings. The conclusions are formulated that the notification of suspicion is an intermediate procedural decision that significantly affects the procedure and methodology of the pre-trial investigation. The notification of suspicion is a legal procedural form of the investigation version, which is subject to verification with the participation of the suspect. The participation of the suspect in verifying this version is a necessary condition for the completeness of the investigation, the realization of his rights and legitimate interests during the pre-trial investigation. After the notification of suspicion is served, its content may subsequently change repeatedly or be replaced by a new suspicion. Therefore, after the expiration of the pre-trial investigation period, there is no point in challenging the initial content of the notification of suspicion on the basis of doubts about the sufficiency of the evidence for this. The object of the appeal (objection) should be only the indictment, which is a final procedural document and is submitted to the court. Originality. For the first time, the essence of a report of suspicion is determined in comparison with the presentation of charges and its impact on the methodology of the pre-trial investigation. Additional arguments are presented regarding the lack of meaning in appealing the initial report of suspicion. Practical significance. The formulated theoretical provisions and practical recommendations are aimed at improving the current criminal procedural legislation, the procedure for drawing up a report of suspicion, and taking into account investigative situations that arise after the interrogation of the suspect.

Key words: suspicion, report of suspicion, internal belief, indictment, appeal, investigation methodology.

References

1. Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine: Law  of  Ukraine№ 4651-VI. (2012, April 12). Retrieved  from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text (in Ukrainian)

2. Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine: Law  of  Ukraine № 1001-05.  (1960, December 28). Retrieved  from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1002-05?find=1&text (in Ukrainian)

3. Misechko, M. (2021) Geneza rozvytku instytutu obgruntovanoi pidozry na ukrainskykh terytoriiakh [The genesis of the development of the institute of reasonable suspicion in Ukrainian territories]. Traektoriâ Nauki, 7, 11,  2001 – 2009. (in Ukrainian)

4. Hloviuk I. V. (2015) Criminal procedural functions: theoretical and methodological principles and implementation practice. Doctor of Law diss. Odessa: ONTU. Retrieved  from: https://dspace.onua.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/c3412cb8-8020-424f-816d-3f5cbfc74cf4/content (in Ukrainian)

5. Hrynchak, V. A., Zaiats, I. Ya., Petliuk, V. I. Et al. (2019). Teoriia kryminalnoho peresliduvannia [The theory of criminal prosecution]: monohrafiia.  Kharkiv: Pravo. (in Ukrainian)

6. Paliukh, A., Huzela, M. (2018) Sutnist kryminalnoho peresliduvannia ta problema yoho zakonodavchoho zakriplennia [The essence of criminal prosecution and the problem of its legislative consolidation]. Retrieved  from: https://science.lpnu.ua/sites/default/files/journal-paper/2019/sep/18331/24.pdf (in Ukrainian)

7. Pysmennyi, D. P. (2013) Funktsii obvynuvachennia ta zakhyst u za novym KPK Ukrainy[Functions of prosecution and defense under the new CPC of Ukraine]. Pravo i suspilstvo, 6-2, 353-358. (in Ukrainian)

8. Misechko, M.M. (2022) Poniattia ta pravova pryroda katehorii «pidozra» [Concept and legal nature of the category “suspicion”]. Elektronne naukove vydannia «Analitychno-porivnialne pravoznavstvo». Retrieved  from: https://app-journal.in.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/59.pdf (in Ukrainian)

9. Novyi tlumachnyi slovnyk ukrainskoi movy (2006) [New explanatory dictionary of the Ukrainian language]. (Vol.  2). Kyiv: Akonit. (in Ukrainian)

10. Mykhailenko, V. (2021) Korotka pidozra – chy «zaide» vona praktykam? [A short suspicion – will it “use” practitioners?]. Retrieved  from: https://justtalk.com.ua/post/korotka-pidozra–chi-zajde-vona-praktikam (in Ukrainian)

11. Muliar, H.V.,  Khovpun,  O.S.,  Chasova,  T.O. (2019). Mekhanizm  oskarzhennia  povidomlennia  pro  pidozru yak zasib zakhystu prav pidozriuvanoi osoby [The mechanism for contesting the notification of suspicion as a means of protecting the rights of the suspect]. Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava, 3, 228-233. (in Ukrainian)

12. Sliusarchuk,  Kh.R. (2019). Oskarzhennia  povidomlennia  pro  pidozru  u  kryminalnomu  provadzhenni: Contra spem spero! [Disputing the notification of suspicion in criminal proceedings: Contra spem spero!]. Pravo i suspilstvo, 4, 314-322. (in Ukrainian)

13. Andrukh, V.V. (2024). Problemy pravovoho rehuliuvannia oskarzhennia povidomlennia pro pidozru [Problems of legal regulation of the appeal of the notice of suspicion]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho Natsionalnoho Universytetu,  Seriia: Pravo, Issue. 84: part 4, 11-17. (in Ukrainian)

14. On amendments to the Economic Procedural Code of Ukraine, the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine, the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine and other legislative acts:  Law  of  Ukraine 2147-VIII. (2017, October 3). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrayiny, 48, 436. Retrieved  from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2147-19#Text (in Ukrainian)