Yermolenko D., Udovyka L. Objective» and «subjective» concepts of legal interpretation in German legal doctrine

DOI: 10.33098/2078-6670.2023.15.27.2.40-46

Purpose. The purpose of the article is to reveal the essence of «objective» and «subjective» concepts of legal interpretation, their theoretical basis and practical application, a comparative analysis of the differences between «objective» and «subjective» concepts of legal interpretation in German legal doctrine. Methodology. The methodology includes a complex comparative analysis and generalization of the available scientific and theoretical material and the formulation of relevant conclusions and recommendations. During the research, the following methods of scientific knowledge were used: analysis of primary sources, comparative analysis, logical analysis, critical analysis, synthesis and generalization. Results. In the process of research, it was established that «objective» and «subjective» concepts of legal interpretation are important elements of German legal doctrine. Both concepts have their advantages and disadvantages, and their application depends on the context and the specific situation. It is important to ensure a balance between general principles and individual rights and interests in order to achieve a more complete and accurate interpretation of legal norms. Originality. In the course of the research, modern trends in the interpretation of law in German legal doctrine were analyzed, new approaches and ideas emerging in this field were reflected, and new theoretical approaches to understanding the «objective» and «subjective» concepts of legal interpretation in German law were proposed. Practical significance. The results of the research can be used in law-making and law-enforcement activities, which can contribute to the development of legal practice and improvement of the legal decision-making process.

Key words: legal interpretation, «objective» concept, «subjective» concept, German legal doctrine, legal concepts, legal certainty, principles of legal interpretation, methodology of legal interpretation.

References

1. Busse, D. (1993). Juristische Semantik: Grundfragen der juristischen Interpretationstheorie in sprachwissenschaftlicher Sicht. Berlin: Duncker und Humboldt. (in German)

2. Rüthers, B., Fischer, C., Birk, A. (2013). Rechtstheorie mit juristischer Methodenlehre. München: C.H. Beck Verlag. (in German)

3. Larenz, K., Canaris, C.-W. (1995). Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. (in German)

4. Stein, E., Frank, G. (2007). Staatsrecht. Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck. (in German)

5. BVerfGE 88, 145 (167). (in German)

6. Hassemer, W. (2008). Juristische Methodenlehre und richterliche Pragmatik. Rechtstheorie. (Vol. 39). Berlin: Duncker und Humblot. S.1–22. (in German)

7. BVerfGE 1, 299 (312). (in German)

8. BVerfGE 11, 126 (130). (in German)

9. BVerfGE), NJW 2011, 836ff. (in German)

10. Engisch, K. (2005). Einführung in das juristische Denken. Stuttgart : Kohlhammer. (in German)

11. Müller, F. (1984). Strukturierende Rechtslehre. Berlin : Duncker und Hamblot. (in German)