Scientific and Information Bulletin

Ivan-Frankivsk University named King Danylo Halytsky

Issue 17(29)

Pitsyk K. The legal nature of taking actions in the property interests of another person without his authorization

Pitsyk K. The legal nature of taking actions in the property interests of another person without his authorization

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33098/2078-6670.2024.17.29.198-203

Purpose. The purpose of the work is to analyze the legal nature, concepts, types and features of the legal regulation of actions in the property interests of another person without his authorization as a non-contractual obligation in the system of civil legal relations.

Methodology. The methodology includes a comprehensive analysis and a synthesis of available scientific and theoretical information. It is includes the formulation of relevant conclusions and recommendations. Such methods of scientific knowledge were used: terminological, functional, systemic-structural, logical-normative.

Results:  In the research process, it was recognized that a person who commits actions for the benefit of another person’s property without his consent is a non-contractual obligation arising on the basis of legal and/or actual actions committed by a person in conditions where there is a risk of negative property consequences and it is impossible obtain the consent of the interested party, including an obligation to reimburse that person for expenses incurred. The parties to the obligation in question are the person who performs actions for the benefit of someone else’s property, the gestor, and the person for whose benefit these actions are performed, the dominus. The gestor and the dominus can be natural or legal entities. The content of the obligations to perform actions in the property interests of another person without his authorization includes the rights and obligations of the manager and the dominus.

Scientific novelty. In the process of research, it was established that although the manager acts voluntarily and his activity is not based on a contract or law, he must follow certain rules, in particular, notify the dominus about taking actions in his interests at the first opportunity. These obligations may be the subject of legal proceedings, they are limited to the property interests of the interested person and provide for the prevention, elimination or mitigation of negative property consequences.

Practical significance. The results of the research can be used in legislation and law-enforcement activities.

Key words: non-contractual obligations, taking actions in the property interests of another person, taking actions in the property interests of another person without his authorization.

References

1.   Civil Code of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine of January 16, 2003, No. 435-IV: as of April 27. 2024 р. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/main/435-15#Text (data zvernennia: 30.04.2024)(in Ukrainian)

2.   Berestova, I. (2003) Instytut bezpidstavnoho zbahachennia v krainakh kontynentalnoi Yevropy: porivnialno–pravovyi analiz. Institute of unjust enrichment in the countries of continental Europe: a comparative legal analysis. [Institute of unjust enrichment in the countries of continental Europe: a comparative legal analysis]. Pravo Ukrainy, 11, 151-153. (in Ukrainian)

3.   Ieromenko T.V. (2002) Porivnialna kharakterystyka deliktiv z instytutom nabuttia, zberezhennia maina bez dostatnoi pravovoi pidstavy (bezpidstavne zbahachennia) ta inshymy zoboviazanniamy po zakhystu tsyvilnykh prav. [Comparative characteristics of torts with the institution of acquisition, preservation of property without a sufficient legal basis (unjustified enrichment) and other obligations to protect civil rights]. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho instytutu rehionalnoho upravlinnia ta prava, 2, 198-200. (in Ukrainian)

4.   Ihnatenko, V.M. (2001). Bezpidstavne zbahachennia: poniattia i vydy. Problemy zakonnosti. [Unjust enrichment: concepts and types], 46, 73-78. (in Ukrainian)

5.   Otradnova, O.O. (2009). Nedohovirni zoboviazannia u tsyvilnomu pravi Ukrainy: navch. posib. [Non-contractual obligations in the civil law of Ukraine: training. manual]. O.O. Otradnova. K.: Yurinkom Inter.(in Ukrainian)

6.   Puchkova, H.V. (2007). Vydy ta zmist zoboviazan, shcho vynykaly vnaslidok bezpidstavnoho zbahachennia u klasychnomu rymskomu pravi [Types and content of obligations arising from unjust enrichment in classical Roman law]. Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava: zb. nauk. Prats, 33, 185-192. (in Ukrainian)

7.   Ihnatenko, V.M. (2004). Odnostoronni pravomirni dii yak pidstavy vynyknennia pozadohovirnykh zoboviazan za Tsyvilnym kodeksom Ukrainy [Unilateral legitimate actions as grounds for non-contractual obligations under the Civil Code of Ukraine]. Derzhavne budivnytstvo ta mistseve samovriaduvannia: zb. nauk. Prats, 7, 104-117. (in Ukrainian)

Науково-інформаційний вісник

Івано-Франківського університету права імені Короля Данила Галицького