Bezklubyi I. The definity of the private law nature of ethical principles f or artificial intelligence technologies

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33098/2078-6670.2024.17.29.212-222

Purpose. The article is aimed at an attempt to single out the private law nature of ethical principles as the basis for regulating relations of using artificial intelligence technologies. Methodology. Understanding of relations of using artificial intelligence, faces the need for methodological justification of their legal basis, and this, in turn, requires an appeal to a wide range of general and special scientific methods, in particular: system-structural, conceptual-logical, sociological, historical, comparative, etc. In essence, the question of the definity of the nature of a particular legal phenomenon is a matter of methodology. Thanks to a special scientific method of legal semantics, an attempt was made to outline the private legal nature of ethical principles that are fundamental in the field of regulating relations of using artificial intelligence technologies. At the interdisciplinary level, problems of a methodological nature are raised, in particular, issues of legal semantics, conceptual-logical approach, historical and comparative understanding of moral and ethical principles. Results. In the course of the study, the interdisciplinary nature of the problems of regulating relations of using artificial intelligence is indicated, which leads to the need for a conscious perception of the moral and ethical principles of human coexistence in the meta-universe. Scientific novelty. It has been determined that ethical principles for artificial intelligence technologies, which are the basis of the rules of behavior of subjects in the digital environment, are of a private legal nature. Practical significance. The results of the study can be used in law-making activities and in the cycle of disciplines of professional and practical training of applicants for the first and second levels of higher education in the specialty of law.

Key words: security, good, relationships, morality, transaction, risk, justice, digital environment.

References

1. Ostapenko, H. Z. (2023) Pryntsyp pravovoi vyznachenosti: teoretyko-prykladni zasady [The principle of legal certainty: theoretical and applied principles]. Kyiv: Parl. Vyd-vo. (in Ukrainian)

2. Bezklubyi, I. (2024) Pravova semantyka poniattia “tsyfrove seredovyshche” [Legal Semantics of the Concept of “Digital Environment”]. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Yurydychni nauky. 1(127). 9-16. (in Ukrainian)

3. The High-Level Expert Group on AI. Available at: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai (accessed 22 April 2025).

4. Baranov, O. (2023) Vyznachennia terminu “shtuchnyi intelekt” [Definition of the term “artificial intelligence.”]. Informatsiia i pravo. 1 (44). 32-49. Available at: https://ippi.org.ua/sites/default/files/5_28.pdf (accessed 26 January 2025). (in Ukrainian)

5. Radutnyi, O. (2021) Pravovyi status ta kharakterystyka tsyfrovoi liudyny [The legal status and characteristics of a digital person]. Informatsiia i pravo. 4(39). 35-51. Available at: https://ippi.org.ua/sites/default/files/5_23.pdf (accessed 20 April 2025). (in Ukrainian)

6. Babetska, I. Ya. (2024) Tsyfrovi rechi yak ob’iekty tsyvilnykh prav [Digital Things as Objects of Civil Rights]. Naukovo-informatsiinyi visnyk Ivano-Frankivskoho universytetu prava imeni Korolia Danyla Halytskoho: Zhurnal. Seriia Pravo. Ivano-Frankivsk: Redaktsiino-vydavnychyi viddil Universytetu Korolia Danyla, 17 (29). 142-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33098/2078-6670.2024.17.29.142-149 (accessed 24 April 2025).(in Ukrainian)

7. Rasel, B. (2023) Istoriia zakhidnoi filosofii [The History of Western Philosophy]. Kharkiv: Folio. (in Ukrainian)

8. Tegmark, Maks (2019) Zhyttia 3.0. Doba shtuchnoho intelektu [Life 3.0 Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence] / per. z anhl. Zoryna Korablina. K.: Nash Format. (in Ukrainian)

9. Zayarnyi, O. (2022). Do pytannia udoskonalennia sposobiv zakhystu informatsiinykh prav fizychnykh osib u vidnosynakh, poviazanykh iz zastosuvanniam tekhnolohii shtuchnoho intelektu [On the issue of improving the ways of protecting the information rights of individuals in relations related to the use of artificial intelligence technologies]. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Yurydychni nauky. 1(120). 36-39. (in Ukrainian)

10.  Radbrukh, H. (2006). Filosofiia prava [The Philosophy of Law]. Kyiv: Tandem. (in Ukrainian)

11. Civil Code of Ukraine (Law of Ukraine 435-IV). Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text (accessed 23 April 2025). (in Ukrainian)

12. Pohrebniak S. P. (2008) Osnovopolozhni pryntsypy prava (zmistovna kharakterystyka) [Fundamental principles of law (meaning description)]. Kh.: Pravo. (in Ukrainian)

13. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12016P/TXT (accessed 23 April 2025). (in English)

14. Davydova, I. V. (2018) Pravochyny ta yikh nediisnist v informatsiinomu suspilstvi: teoriia i praktyka [Transactions and their invalidity in the information society: theory and practice]. NU OIuA. Odesa: Yurydychna literatura. (in Ukrainian)

15. Makafi Endriu, Brinolfsson Erik (2019) Mashyna, platforma, natovp. Yak pryborkaty nashe tsyfrove maibutnie [Machine, Platform, Crowd: Harnessing Our Digital Future] \ per. z anhl. O. Astashova. K.: Nash format. (in Ukrainian)

16. Brashchuk, I., Kavyn, S. (2023) Mizhnarodno-pravove rehuliuvannia zabezpechennia informatsiinoi bezpeky v ramkakh OON [International legal regulation of information security within the UN]. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Yurydychni nauky. 125(1), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2195/2023/1.125-4 (accessed 20 April 2025). (in Ukrainian)

17. Bezklubyi, I. (2023) Metodolohiia minimizatsii yurydychnykh ryzykiv u misti [Methodology for minimizing legal risks in the city]. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Yurydychni nauky. 1(125), 17-20. (in Ukrainian)

18. Kokhanovska, O. V. (2006) Teoretychni problemy informatsiinykh vidnosyn u tsyvilnomu pravi [Theoretical problems of information relations in civil law]. K.: Vydavnycho-polihrafichnyi tsentr “Kyivskyi universytet”. (in Ukrainian)

19. Universal Declaration of Human Rights Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_015#Text (accessed 23 April 2025) (in Ukrainian)

20. Bryzhko, V. (2021) Modalnist pravovoi vyznachenosti u sferi zakhystu ta bezpeky pryvatnosti personalnykh danykh [Modality of legal certainty in the field of protection and security of personal data privacy]. Informatsiia i pravo. 4 (39). 52-69. Available at: https://ippi.org.ua/sites/default/files/6_22.pdf  (accessed 23 April 2025). (in Ukrainian)

21. Hudyma N. (2005) Pryntsypy vidkrytosti i prozorosti ta yikh realizatsiia v derzhavnomu upravlinni Ukrainy [Principles of openness and transparency and their implementation in public administration of Ukraine]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii derzhavnoho upravlinnia pry Prezydentovi Ukrainy. 77 — 83. (in Ukrainian)

22. Artificial Intelligence Act. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0138_EN.html (accessed 24 April 2025).

23. Malakhov V. (2002) Blaho [Good]. Filosofskyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk / V. I. Shynkaruk (hol. redkol.) ta in. Kyiv : Instytut filosofii imeni Hryhoriia Skovorody NAN Ukrainy : Abrys. Available at: http://slovopedia.org.ua/104/53393/1082795.html “> благо </a >. (accessed 23 April 2025). (in Ukrainian)

24. Holovatyi, S. (2006) Verkhovenstvo prava: vid doktryny do pryntsypu [Rule of law: from doctrine to principle]. U trokh knyhakh. Knyha druha. K.: Vydavnytstvo “Feniks” (in Ukrainian)

25. Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge Harvard University Press. (in English)