Scientific and Information Bulletin

Ivan-Frankivsk University named King Danylo Halytsky

Issue 19(31)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33098/2078-6670.2025.19.31.396-405 Repetskyi S., Habuda A. Topical issues of administrative and criminal liability for committing hooliganism

Repetskyi S., Habuda A. Topical issues of administrative and criminal liability for committing hooliganism

Purpose. The aim of this study is to explore the current challenges related to administrative and criminal liability for acts of hooliganism, to define the criteria distinguishing petty from criminally punishable hooliganism, and to analyze such features as «offensive harassment of citizens», «other similar acts disrupting public order and peace», «gross violation of public order», «explicit disrespect for society», «exceptional cynicism» and «particular audacity». The study also aims to formulate proposals for improving the current legislation and law enforcement practices in Ukraine. Methodology. The methodology involves a comprehensive analysis and synthesis of existing scientific-theoretical and legislative materials, judicial practice, and the formulation of appropriate conclusions and recommendations. The following methods of scientific inquiry were used in the research: comparative legal, logical and grammatical, systemic-structural, and modeling. Results. The study reveals that current Ukrainian administrative and criminal legislation lacks clear criteria for distinguishing administrative from criminally punishable hooliganism. Most of the existing developments in this area are reflected in academic works and judicial practice; however, these sources do not fully disclose the content of the identified features. The relevant administrative and criminal legal provisions on hooliganism contain a significant number of evaluative terms, which complicates their practical application. Consequently, there remains a pressing need to legislatively define specific acts that qualify as petty or criminal hooliganism, which is essential for effectively combating such offenses and ensuring fair liability. Scientific Novelty. The research identifies a range of progressive approaches to addressing current problems of criminal and administrative liability for hooliganism, which may inform future legislative initiatives concerning liability for offenses in this area. A key novelty lies in the shift away from vague evaluative terminology towards the introduction of clearly defined regulations for hooligan acts in the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses and the Criminal Code of Ukraine. This would ensure the principles of inevitability of punishment and fair liability for those found guilty of such offenses. Practical Significance. The findings of the study may be used in law enforcement and legislative activities for further refinement of Ukraine’s administrative and criminal legislation concerning liability for hooliganism. They may also be incorporated into the educational process when teaching and studying the disciplines «Administrative Law of Ukraine», «Criminal Law of Ukraine», «Contemporary Issues of Administrative Law and Procedure», «Administrative Jurisdictional Activities of Law Enforcement Agencies» and «Topical Problems of Criminal Law and Procedure».

Key words: hooliganism, petty hooliganism, administrative liability, criminal liability, offense, public order, gross violation, explicit disrespect for society, exceptional cynicism, particular audacity.

References

1. Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses (Articles 1-212-24). (2025, April 17). Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/80731-10#Text (accessed 01 May 2025). (in Ukrainian)

2. Kaliuzhnyi, R. A., Komziuk A. T., Pohribnyi O. O. et al. (2008). Kodeks Ukrainy pro administratyvni pravoporushennia: naukovo-praktychnyi komentar [Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses: Scientific and Practical Commentary]. Kyiv: Vseukrainska asotsiatsiia vydavtsiv «Pravova iednist». (in Ukrainian)

3. Korzhanskyi M. Y. (2002). Kvalifikatsiia zlochyniv: [Qualification of Crimes]. Kyiv: Atika. (in Ukrainian)

4. Criminal Code of Ukraine. (2025, May 09). Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14#Text (accessed 10 May 2025). (in Ukrainian)

5. Aleksandrov Yu., V., Dudorov, O. O., Klymenko, V. A. et al. (2009). Kryminalne pravo Ukrainy. Osoblyva chastyna [Criminal Law of Ukraine. Special Part]. Kyiv: Atika. (in Ukrainian)

6. Baulin, Yu. V., Borysov, V. I., Tiutiuhin, V. I. et al. (2015). Kryminalne pravo Ukrainy. Osoblyva chastyna [Criminal Law of Ukraine. Special Part]. Kharkiv: Pravo. (in Ukrainian)

7. Nalutsyshyn, V. V. (2013). Vyznachennia oznak obiektyvnoi storony khulihanstva [Determining the Features of the Objective Side of Hooliganism]. Pravo i suspilstvo, 6-2, 297–301. (in Ukrainian)

8. Melnyk, M. I., Khavroniuk, M. I. (2018). Kryminalnyi kodeks Ukrainy: naukovo-praktychnyi komentar [Criminal Code of Ukraine: Scientific and Practical Commentary]. Kyiv: Dakor. (in Ukrainian)

9. Lemak, V. V. (2020, June 11). Okrema dumka suddi Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy stosovno Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytsiynym podanniam 55 narodnykh deputativ Ukrainy shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiynosti) statti 375 Kryminalnoho kodeksu Ukrainy, 7-r/2020. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/nd07d710-20#Text (accessed 15 May 2025). (in Ukrainian)

10. Osadchyi, V. I. (2004). Problems of Criminal Law Protection of Law Enforcement Activities: PhD thesis abstract. Kyiv. (in Ukrainian)

11. Postanova vid 06.12.2023, sprava № 490/10923/23. Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/115471003 (accessed 10 May 2025). (in Ukrainian)

12. Poshtarenko, O. V. (2020). Administratyvna vidpovidalnist za dribne khulihanstvo yak forma proiavu nasylstva shchodo fizychnoi osoby v Ukraini [Administrative Liability for Petty Hooliganism as a Form of Violence Against an Individual in Ukraine]. Visnyk Zaporizkoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Yurydychni nauky, 1, 173–179. (in Ukrainian)

13. On Registered Criminal Offenses and the Results of Their Pre-trial Investigation. Available at: https://gp.gov.ua/ua/posts/pro-zareyestrovani-kriminalni-pravoporushennya-ta-rezultati-yih-dosudovogo-rozsliduvannya-2 (accessed 01 May 2025). (in Ukrainian)

14. Draft of the new Criminal Code of Ukraine as of April 2, 2025. Available at: https://newcriminalcode.org.ua/upload/media/2025/04/03/00-kontrolnyj-proyekt-kk-02-04-2025.pdf (accessed 18 May 2025). (in Ukrainian)

15. On the Peculiarities of Ensuring Public Order and Public Safety in Connection with the Preparation and Holding of Football Matches: Law of Ukraine № 3673-VI. (2011, July 08). Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3673-17#Text (accessed 03 May 2025). (in Ukrainian)

16. On Judicial Practice in Cases of Hooliganism: Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Ukraine № 10 (2006, December 22) Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/va010700-06#Text (accessed 02 May 2025). (in Ukrainian)

17. Slovnyk.ua. Available at: https://slovnyk.ua/index.php (accessed 15 May 2025). (in Ukrainian)

18. Tatarenko, H. V., Tatarenko, I. V., Popova, Yu. O. (2021). Obiektyvna storona khulihanstva: problemy vyznachennia oznak [Objective Side of Hooliganism: Problems of Defining Characteristics]. Aktualni problemy prava: teoriia i praktyka, 2 (42), 168–175. (in Ukrainian)

Науково-інформаційний вісник

Івано-Франківського університету права імені Короля Данила Галицького