Andrukhiv O. Legal nature of the concept of genocide: international and national experience

https://doi.org/10.33098/2078-6670.2023.16.28.8-15

Purpose. The purpose of our research is to characterize and compare the main approaches to the interpretation of the content of the concept of genocide in international and national law. Method. The methodology includes the complex use of scientific approaches and principles, as well as general scientific, philosophical and special scientific methods. Results. It has been established that Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine and atrocities against the civilian population are an example of the fact that the crime of genocide, as a form of individual and collective responsibility of the aggressor state against a sovereign state and its population, requires a thorough legal justification, both within the international and within the limits of national law. Actually, the signs of genocide remain debatable in international law, because the planned physical destruction of a separate ethnic group or people is often interpreted as “ethnic cleansing” and at the same time the concept of “genocide” is used in order to draw attention to individual actions or inactions of the state. In the national legislation, the concept of genocide is used in accordance with the interpretation of the Holodomor of 1932-1933 and the actual events of the full-scale invasion. However, if in the case of the Holodomor, one can only monitor the preservation of historical memory, because it is impossible to bring to justice the perpetrators of the genocide against Ukrainians in the 1930s, then the modern crimes of Russians must be clearly recorded and brought to justice both in the military and above military and political leadership of the aggressor state. Scientific novelty. An analysis of the main aspects of international and national legislation defining the crime of genocide was carried out. Practical significance. The results of the research can be used in further historical and legal studies, preparation of special courses.

Key words: genocide, international law, national law, human rights, UN.

References

1.     Vazhna, K. (2017). Sutnist henotsydu vidpovidno do chynnoho mizhnarodnoho prava ta mizhnarodno-pravovoi praktyky [The essence of genocide according to current international law and international legal practice]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo [Entrepreneurship, economy and law], 8, 193-197. (in Ukrainian)

2.      Ivchuk, Yu.Iu. (2023). Poniattia «henotsydu» yak mizhnarodnoho zlochynu ta osoblyvosti prytiahnennia do vidpovidalnosti u svitli zbroinoi ahresii Rosiiskoi Federatsii proty Ukrainy [The concept of «genocide» as an international crime and specifics of prosecution in the light of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine]. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal [Legal scientific electronic journal], 4, 685-687. (in Ukrainian)

3.      Kasianov, H. (2019). Rozryta mohyla: Holod 1932-1933 rokiv u politytsi, pamiati ta istorii (1980-ti ‒ 2000-ni) [The Digged Grave: The Famine of 1932-1933 in Politics, Memory and History (1980s – 2000s)]. Kharkiv: Folio. (in Ukrainian)

4.      The Convention on the Prevention of the Crime of Genocide and its Punishment. Avaliable at: http://www.preventgenocide.org/ua/konventsia.htm. (in Ukrainian)

5.      Lemkin, R. (2009). Radianskyi henotsyd v Ukraini (stattia 28 movamy) [Soviet genocide in Ukraine (article in 28 languages)]. K.: Maisternia knyhy. (in Ukrainian)

6.      Poroshenko Petro: «Potribno vvesty vidpovidalnist za nevyznannia Holodomoru» [Poroshenko Petro: «It is necessary to introduce responsibility for the non-recognition of the Holodomor»]. Avaliable at: http://www.nrcu.gov.ua/news.html?newsID=64992 (in Ukrainian)

7.      About the Holodomor of 1932-1933 in Ukraine: Law of Ukraine. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR). 2006. 50, 504. Avaliable at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/376-16#Text. (in Ukrainian)

8.     On the prevention and punishment of crimes of genocide and punishment for it: UN Convention. URL: https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/MU48K03U (in Ukrainian)

9.      On the Statement of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine «On the Russian Federation Committing Genocide in Ukraine»: Resolution of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Avaliable at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2188-20#Text (in Ukrainian)

10.   On the Address to the Ukrainian People of the participants of the special meeting of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on May 14, 2003 regarding the commemoration of the victims of the Holodomor of 1932-1933: Resolution of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady (VVR). 2003. 30, 262. Avaliable at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/789-15#Text (in Ukrainian)

11.    Khaustova, M. (2019). Sutnist poniattia zlochynu henotsydu v mizhnarodnomu pravi [The essence of the concept of the crime of genocide in international law]. Porivnialno-analitychne pravo [Comparative and analytical law], 1, 73–76. (in Ukrainian)

12.    What is genocide: legal dimension. Avaliable at: https://ti-ukraine.org/news/shho-take-genotsyd-pravovyj-vymir/ (in Ukrainian)

13. Gaeta, P. (2007). On what conditions can a state be held responsible for genocide? European Journal of International Law. (Vol. 18),  4, 631-648. (in English)

14. Lemkin, R. (1944). Axis rule in occupied Europe. Washington. Avaliable at: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015005077436&seq=5. (in English)

15. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 17 July 1998. The official site of the International Criminal Court. Avaliable at: http://www.icc-cpi.int/NR/rdonlyres/ADD16852-AEE9-4757-ABE7-9CDC7CF02886/283503/ RomeStatutEng1.pdf. (in English)

20. Weiss-Wendt, A. When the End Justifies the Means: Raphaël Lemkin and the Shaping of a Popular Discourse on Genocide. Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal: Vol. 13: Iss. 1. РР. 173-188. Avaliable at: https://commons.com.ua/ru/rafael-lemkin-ta-formuvannya-diskursu-pro-genocid/ (in English)