Khodak S. Forms of protection of interests in family law

DOI: 10.33098/2078-6670.2021.11.23.146-158

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to determine the forms of protection of interests in family law. It is also necessary to disclose the features of forms of protection of interests in family law, and consideration of jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional forms of their protection. Methodology. Among the philosophical, general and special scientific methods used such as is the technical and legal method, which is used in the study of methods and forms of protection of interests in family law. Scientific novelty is that the article states that under the form of protection of interests in Family law should be understood as an internally agreed set of family law-based organizational and other measures carried out within a single type of procedures, agreed on a common goal, aimed at preventing, terminating violations and restoring them, by a special jurisdiction The study further developed the provision that the list of ways to protect family interests should go beyond the Family Code, be open, which determines the possibility of their protection in other ways not prohibited by law. Under the jurisdictional form of protection of interests in family law means e activity of the bodies authorized by the state on protection of family rights and interests of participants of family relations. The bodies that provide such protection include: the court, guardianship authorities, notary and prosecutor. The universality of the judicial form of protection of interests in family law is substantiated. At the same time, an approach has been adopted, according to which not only the violated interest is subject to protection, but also such an interest, which has not been violated at the time of protection in order to prevent violation. A non-jurisdictional form of protection of family interests is a factual action that a subject of family law commits to protect his or her own interest or the interest of another person without recourse to the relevant jurisdictions. Results. The author singles out two ways of exercising the right to self-defense of interest in family law: 1) self-defense of one’s interest; 2) self-defense of another person’s interest. The article proves the effectiveness of mediation as a jurisdictional form of protection of family interests. Practical significance. The results of the study can be used in lawmaking to improve legislation in the field of legal regulation of the category of interest; in the educational process – in the development of textbooks, teaching materials on the subject “Family Law of Ukraine”.

Key words: interest, private interests, public interests, legitimate interest, subjective law, presumption, jurisdictional form of protection, non-jurisdictional form of protection.

References

1.     Mykhailova, E. V. (2005) Storony v grazhdanskom processe Rossijskoj Federacii: uchebn. posob. [Paradigm approach to the study of intellectual rights of the Parties in the civil process of the Russian Federation: textbook]. Samara: Samarskyi unyversytet. 167 p. (in Russian)

2.    Sennykov, Y. E. (2002). Zakonnyj interes kak forma vyrazheniya pravovykh vozmozhnostej (dozvolenij) i ob”ekt sudebno-pravovoj zashchity [Legitimate interest as a form of expression of legal possibilities (permissions) and an object of judicial protection]. Pravo: Teoryia y Praktyka, 3, 14-16. Retrived from: http://www.yurclub.ru/ docs/pravo/1403/13.html (in Russian)

3.    Shershenevych, H.F. (1995). Obshchaia teoryia prava: uchebnoe posobye [General theory of law: textbook]. ( Vols. 1-2). M.: Yzd-vo «Iurydycheskyi kolledzh MHU. 805 p.; Borchardt, G. (1989). Soft law in european Community law.  European law revew, 5 (14), 263-268.

4.    Kozhukhar, A. N. (1989). Pravo na sudebnuiu zashchytu v yskovom proyzvodstve [The right to judicial protection in a claim]. Kyshynev: Shtyyntsa. 140 p. (in Russian)

5.    Churpita, H. V. (2017). Do poniattia zakhystu simeinykh prav ta interesiv v poriadku tsyvilnoho sudochynstva [To the concept of protection of family rights and interests in civil proceedings]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo, 4, 44-47. Retrived from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Pgip_2017_4_10 (in Ukrainian)

6.    Maleyn, N. S. (1981). Grazhdanskij zakon i prava lichnosti v SSSR [Civil law and individual rights in the USSR]. M.: Yuryd. lyt. 216 p. (in Russian)

7.    Alekseev, S. S. (1981). Obshchaya teoriya prava [General theory of law]. (Vol. 1). M. : Yuryd. Lyt. 360 p. (in Russian)

8.    Diakovych, M.M. (2014). Okhorona i zakhyst simeinykh prav ta interesiv notariusom : monohrafiia [Protection and defense of family rights and interests by a notary: a monograph]. K.:Istyna. 520 p. (in Ukrainian)

9.    Tripulskyi, H.Ia. (2008). Remedial features of consideration of disputes which are connected with occurrence, realisation and change of personal non-property legal relations between parents and children: PhD thesis abstract. O., 2008.  20 p.  (in Ukrainian)

10.  Dzera, O.V.,  Dzera, I.O. (2014). Sposoby zakhystu tsyvilnykh prav ta interesiv u suchasnomu tsyvilnomu pravi Ukrainy [Ways to protect civil rights and interests in modern civil law of Ukraine]. Aktualni problemy pryvatnoho prava Ukrainy. K.: PrAT «Iurydychna praktyka», 127–152. (in Ukrainian)

11. Il’ina, O.YU. (2007). Problemy interesa v semejnom prave Rossijskoj Federacii [Problems of interest in family law of the Russian Federation]. Moskva: Gorodec.  192 p. Retriver from: https://www.lawmix.ru/commlaw/1061. (in Russian)

12. Chervonyj, YU.S., Volosatyj G.S., Ermolaeva V.O. (2007). Grazhdanskij processual’nyj kodeks Ukrainy: nauchno-prakticheskij kommentarij [Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine: Scientific and Practical Commentary].  KH.: Odissej.  792 p. (in Russian)

13. Ivanov, O. V. (1967). Zashchita grazhdanskikh prav kak pravovoj institut i kak nauchnaya problema [Protection of civil rights as a legal institution and as a scientific problem]. Voprosy sovetskogo gosudarstva i prava: Trudy Irkutskogo universiteta im. A.A. Zhdanova. Seriya yuridicheskaya  Vol. 45,  Issue. 8,  Part. 3..  41–56. (in Russian)

14. Romovskaia,  Z.  V. (1985). Zashchyta  v  sovetskom  semeinom  prave  [Protection in Soviet family law]. L.: Vyshcha shk., 180 p. (in Russian)

15. Venediktova, I. V. (2011). Metodolohichni zasady okhoroniuvanykh zakonom interesiv u pryvatnomu pravi: monohrafiia [Methodological principles of legally protected interests in private law: monograph].  Kh.: Nove Slovo. 260 p.  (in Ukrainian)

16. Romovskaia, Z. V. Protection problems in Soviet family law: PhD thesis abstract.  Kharkov. 49 p. (in Russian)

17. Churpita, H. V. (2015). Subiektyvni simeini prava ta okhoroniuvani zakonom yak obiekt sudovoho zakhystu [Subjective family rights and protected by law as an object of judicial protection]. Naukovyi visnyk natsionalnoi akademii vnutrishnikh sprav,  3, 130-136.  Retrived from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nvknuvs_2015_3_18 (in Ukrainian)

18. Reshetnyk, Ye. M. (2014). Umovy ta moment vynyknennia prava na zakhyst subiektyvnoho simeinoho interesu [Conditions and moment of emergence of the right to protection of subjective family interest]. Pravo i suspilstvo, 1–2, 59–62. (in Ukrainian)

19. Bratus, N. S. (1976). Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost’ i zakonnost’ [Legal responsibility and legality].  M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura. 216 p. (in Russian)

20. Zhelikhovska, Yu. (2014). Notarialni formy ta sposoby zakhystu tsyvilnykh prav [Notarial forms and methods of protection of civil rights]. Yurydychnyi radnyk, 3(75). Retrived from :  http://yurradnik.com.ua/stati/d0-bd-d0-be-d1-82-d0-b0-d1-80-d1-96-d0-b0-d0-bb-d1-8c-d0-bd-d1-96-d1-84-d0-be-d1-80-d0-bc-d0-b8-d1-82-d0-b0-d1-81-d0-bf-d0-be-d1-81-d0-be-d0-b1-d0-b8-d0-be-d1-85-d0-be-d1-80-d0-be-d0-bd-d0-b8/. (in Ukrainian)

21. Leko, B. (2017). Mediatsiia v simeinykh konfliktakh i rozluchenniakh [Mediation in family conflicts and divorces]. Pidpryiemstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo, 5,  29–32 (in Ukrainian)

22. Family Code of Ukraine. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 2002, 21-22, at.135. Retrived from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2947-14#Text. (in Ukrainian)

23. Venediktova, I. V. (2014). Zakhyst okhoroniuvanykh zakonom interesiv u tsyvilnomu pravi: monohrafiia [Protection of legally protected interests in civil law: a monograph].  K.: Yurinkom Inter. 288 s. (in Ukrainian)

24. Serdechna, I.L. Samozakhyst osobystykh nemainovykh prav inshykh chleniv simi  ta rodychiv [Self-protection of personal non-property rights of other family members and relatives].  Retrived from: http://www.univer.km.ua/visnyk/1791.pdf (in Ukrainian)