Issue № 14(26)
DOI: 10.33098/2078-6670.2022.14.26.97-110 Apanasenko K. Regarding the preventive protection of public interests in a field of urban planning
Apanasenko K. Regarding the preventive protection of public interests in a field of urban planning
The article aims to conduct a theoretical analysis of an issue of a possibility of the preventive protection of public interests, in particular, on an example of economic legal relations in the field of urban planning. The research methodology has included a generalization of theoretical approaches to understanding the concepts of “public interests” and “preventive protection of rights” (including in a field of economic law and procedural legal science), available in legal science, research a content of public interests in the field of urban planning and further analysis of a legal nature of rights and the interests that state architectural and construction control bodies defend in court, and a nature of the respective lawsuits. At the same time, terminological, systemic-structural, legal-dogmatic methods and interdisciplinary analysis were applied. The results. The author expressed a working hypothesis about a possibility of going to court with preventive lawsuits, which will protect not only private rights and interests, but also public interests, and proved it with arguments on the example of lawsuits by SACC bodies in the field of urban planning. It is substantiated that a number of lawsuits that may be brought to court by SACC bodies may have the purpose of preventive protection of public interests in the sustainable development of the community territory, prevention of possible harm to the life and health of citizens, the property of individuals and legal entities and the surrounding natural environment, cultural/ archeological heritage. The author also substantiated the existence of a public interest in compliance with legislation, which is transformed into an interest in ensuring legal economic order in the field of economy. In domestic scientific literature the issue of preventive protection of public interests was generally not objectively analyzed, which constitutes the scientific novelty of the conducted research. The results of the study contribute to the scientific study of the issue of the protection of public interests in court and the preventive protection of rights and interests in court, which will further contribute to the justification of changes to the procedural legislation on the possibility of preventive judicial protection of public interests. This is the practical significance of the work.
Key words: preventive protection, public interests, interests in the field of economy, urban planning, SACC bodies, judicial protection of interests, spontaneous construction.
References
1. Zadykhailo, V.D., Pashkov, V.M. (Ed.). (2012). Hospodarske pravo [Economic law].Kharkiv: Pravo. (in Ukrainian)
2. Prytyka, Yu.D. (2006). Theoretical problems of protecting the rights of participants in civil legal relations in the arbitration court: PhD thesis abstract. Kyiv. (in Ukrainian)
3. Petrunia, V.V. (2019). The concept and system of ways to protect the rights of business entities: PhD thesis abstract. Odesa. (in Ukrainian)
4. Lisnicha, T.V. (2014). Osoblyvosti hospodarsko-pravovoho zakhystu prav subiektiv hospodariuvannia [Peculiarities of economic legal protection of the rights of economic entities]. Chasopys z yurydychnykh nauk. Retrieved from: https://periodicals.karazin.ua/jls/issue/view/187 (accessed 13 November 2022) (in Ukrainian)
5. Analysis of the administration of justice by the Cassation Administrative Court as part of the Supreme Court and the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court in the first half of 2022. Available at:
https://supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/media/new_folder_for_uploads/supreme/ogliady/Analiz_KAS_VP_I_pivr_2022.pdf (accessed 11 November 2022).
6. Kot, O. (2016). Preventyvni sposoby zakhystu prava vlasnosti u systemi zakhystu prav. [Preventive methods of protecting property rights in the rights protection system]. Yurydychna Ukraina, 7-8, 38-45. (in Ukrainian)
7. Koroied, S.O., Prut, Yu. A. (2017). Realizatsiia preventyvnoho sposobu zakhystu prava vlasnosti v tsyvilnomu sudochynstvi. [Implementation of a preventive method of property rights protection in civil proceedings]. Sudova apeliatsiia, 1 (46), 92-98. (in Ukrainian)
8. Zhylinkova, I. (2005). Preventyvnyi sposib zakhystu prava vlasnosty. [Preventive method of property rights protection]. Visnyk Akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy, 3 (42), 130-135. (in Ukrainian)
9. Stepanenko, T.V. (2008). Judicial proceedings in cases of lawsuits for the protection of the rights and interests of an unspecified group of persons: PhD thesis abstract. Kharkiv. (in Ukrainian)
10. Riabchenko, Yu.Iu. (2016). Do pytannia roli sudu u vstanovlenni obstavyn u spravakh za pozovamy na zakhyst prav nevyznachenoho kola osib. [To a question of a role of a court in the establishing circumstances in cases of lawsuits for the protection of rights of unspecified group of persons]. Pravo i suspilstvo, 1, p. 2, 49 – 54. (in Ukrainian)
11. Bernaziuk, Ya.O. (2022). Analiz sudovoi praktyky v deiakykh katehoriiakh sprav shchodo zakhystu suspilnoho (publichnoho) interesu. [Analysis of judicial practice in some categories of cases regarding a protection of public interest]. Visnyk LDUVS im. E.O. Didorenka, 1 (97), 159-168. (in Ukrainian)
12. Zolotukhina, L.O. (2019). Public interest as an administrative-legal category: PhD thesis abstract. Zaporizhzhia. (in Ukrainian)
13. Berestova, I.E. (2019). Protection of public interests of participants in civil relations: the relationship between civil proceedings and constitutional proceedings: PhD diss. Kyiv: NALS. (in Ukrainian)
14. Bychkova, S.S. (Ed.) (2011). Tsyvilnyi protsesualnyi pravovyi status osib, yaki berut uchast u spravakh pozovnoho provadzhennia: monohrafiia [Civil procedural legal status of persons participating in lawsuit proceedings: monograph]. Kyiv: Atika. (in Ukrainian)
15. Komarov, V.V. (2008) Problemy teorii ta praktyky tsyvilnoho sudochynstva [Problems of the theory and practice of civil justice]. Kharkiv: Kharkiv yurydychnyi. (in Ukrainian)
16. Shcherbyna, V. (2022). Konverhentsiia pryvatnoho i publichnoho prava v rehuliuvanni vidnosyn u sferi hospodariuvannia [Convergence of private and public law in the regulation of business relations]. Pravo Ukrainy, 2, 21-33. (in Ukrainian)
17. Boichuk, R.P. (2017). Problema pravovoho zabezpechennia balansu publichnykh i pryvatnykh interesiv u sferi investytsiinykh vidnosyn. [The problem of legal provision of the balance of public and private interests in a field of investment relations]. Pravo ta innovatsiine suspilstvo, 2 (9), 14-22. (in Ukrainian)
18. Venher, Yu.V. (2014). Mistse standartyzatsii v administratyvno-pravovomu rehuliuvanni hospodarskoi diialnosti v Ukraini. [The place of standardization in an administrative legal regulation of an economic activity in Ukraine]. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Ser.: Yurysprudentsiia, 10-1(1), 96-99. (in Ukrainian)
19. Vasilev, M.I. (2003). Publichnye interesy v ekologicheskom prave [Public interests in environmental law]. Moscow: Izdat-vo MGU. (in Russian)
20. Derkach, E.M. (2021). Legal regulation of economic activity in the field of transport: theoretical and applied problems: PhD thesis abstract. Kyiv. (in Ukrainian)
21. Apanasenko, K. I. (2020). Dozvilni pravovidnosyny u sferi hospodariuvannia: problemy teorii i praktyky [Permissive legal relations in the field of an economic work: problems of theory and practice]. Kyiv: DU «Instytut ekonomiko-pravovykh doslidzhen imeni V. K. Mamutova Natsionalnoi akademii nauk Ukrainy». (in Ukrainian)
22. Vinnyk, O.M. (2004). Theoretical aspects of legal support for the realization of public and private interests in economic companies: PhD thesis abstract. Kyiv. (in Ukrainian)
23. Chugurova, T.V. (2007). Procedural forms of the protection of public interests in Russian law: PhD diss. Samara. (in Russian)
24. Sierov, S.L. (2019). Nahliad i kontrol v sferi hospodarskoi diialnosti yak zasib realizatsii publichnoho interesu. [Supervision and control in the field of economic activity as a means of realizing the public interest]. LEX PORTUS, 1 (15), 118-130. (in Ukrainian)
25. Zarudniev, Ye.O. (2012). Shchodo publichnoho interesu u sferi hospodariuvannia v Ukraini ta Federatyvnii Respublitsi Nimechchyna ta YeS. [Regarding the public interest in the field of business in Ukraine and the Federal Republic of Germany and the EU]. Forum prava, 4, 378-384. (in Ukrainian)
26. Halunko, V., Dikhtiievskyi, P., Kuzmenko, O., Stetsenko, S. (2018). Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy. Povnyi kurs: pidruchnyk. [Administrative law of Ukraine. Complete course: textbook]. Kherson: OLDIPLIuS. (in Ukrainian)
27. Zadykhailo, D.V. (2012). Ekonomichna systema yak orhanichnyi obiekt zakonodavchoho zabezpechennia. [Economic system as an organic object of legislative provision]. Visnyk Akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy, 4(71), 210-221. (in Ukrainian)
28. Pavlushina, A.A. (2003). Zashita publichnogo interesa kak universalnaya processualnaya forma. [Protection of public interest as an universal procedural form]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava, 76-84. (in Russian)
29. Muradyan, E.M., Tihinya, V.G. (1987). Predupreditelnyj isk v grazhdanskom processe. [Preventive lawsuit in civil proceedings]. Pravovedenie, 4, 75-79.(in Russian)
30. Sahnova, T.V. (2011). Civilisticheskij process: ontologiya sudebnoj zashity. [Civilistic process: ontology of judicial protection]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo processa, 1. (in Russian)
31. Belianevych, E.A. (2011). O preventyvnoi zashchyte hrazhdanskykh prav [About preventive protection of civil rights]. Yuryst, 8. Retrieved from: https://journal.zakon.kz/4458624-o-preventivnojj-zashhitegrazhdanskikh.html (in Russian)
32. Kot, O. (2015). Preventyvni sposoby zakhystu prava vlasnosti: doktryna i sudova praktyka [Preventive methods of protection of property rights: doctrine and judicial practice.]. Pravo vlasnosti: yevropeiskyi dosvid ta ukrainski realii: Zbirnyk dopovidei i materialiv Mizhnarodnoi konferentsii (p. 138). Kyiv: VAITE. (in Ukrainian)
33. Tihomirov Yu.A. (1995). Publichnoe pravo [Public law]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo BEK. (in Russian)