Ostrohliad O. CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED: INTRODUCTION AND INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE

DOI: 10.33098/2078-6670.2019.7.19. 165-173

Purpose. The purpose of the work is to consider the novels of the criminal law, providing for criminalization of driving while intoxicated. To compare the severity of responsibility according to the rules in force, the introduced and similar rules of individual foreign countries. The methodology. The methodology includes a comprehensive analysis and synthesis of the available scientific and theoretical material and the formulation of relevant conclusions and recommendations. During the study, the following methods of scientific knowledge were used: terminological, logical-semantic, system-structural, logical-normative, comparative. Results in the process of the study determined that despite the fact that the punishment provided by the Criminal Code norm in its severity is inferior to the norm of the Administrative Offenses Code of Ukraine, its consequences for a person are more significant and can lead to a decrease in offenses of this type. On the basis of a comparative study, the state of legal regulation of this institution in certain foreign countries was determined. Originality. In the process of the study, it was established that the ratio of criminal and administrative responsibility in accordance with the “Engel Criteria” in the matter of criminal liability for driving while intoxicated is debatable and requires further improvement. The severity of criminal responsibility proposed may lead to a decrease in the number of offenses only in conjunction with other measures. Practical significance. The results of the study can be used in law enforcement practice of the norms of the Criminal Code, road safety, as an aid in legal training on the observance of traffic rules by drivers.

Key words: crime, road safety, state of intoxication, vehicle, driving; alcoholic, narcotic or other intoxication; the effect of drugs that reduce attention and reaction rate.

References

1.         Burdin V. M. Stan spianinnia yak obstavyna, shcho obtiazhuie pokarannia: problemy suchasnoho naukovoho rozuminnia.  Visnyk Khmelnytskoho instytutu rehionalnoho upravlinnia ta prava.  2004.  № 1-2.  S. 177-182.

2.         Kodeks Ukrainy pro administratyvni pravoporushennia. Za stanom na 19.05.2019. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/80731-10

3.         Kryminalnyi kodeks Azerbaidzhanskoi Respubliky, Kryminalnyi kodeks Respubliky Kazakhstan / pid. red. V.L. Menchynskoho. Pereklad na ukrainsku movu T.V. Rudenko. K.: OVK, 2016. 490 s.

4.         Kryminalnyi kodeks Korolivstva Ispaniia / pid. red. V.L. Menchynskoho. Pereklad na ukrainsku movu O.V. Lishevskoi. K.: OVK, 2016. 284 s.

5.         Kryminalnyi kodeks Respubliky Bilorus, Kryminalnyi kodeks Respubliky Moldova / pid. red. V.L. Menchynskoho. Pereklad na ukrainsku movu T.V. Rudenko. K.: OVK, 2016. 462 s.

6.         Kryminalnyi kodeks Respubliky Polshcha / pid. red. V.L. Menchynskoho. Pereklad na ukrainsku movu V.S. Stanich. K.: OVK, 2016. 138 s.

7.         Kryminalnyi kodeks Ukrainy vid 5 kvitnia 2001 r. [Elektronnyi resurs] : stanom na 26 liutoho 2019 r. / Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. URL: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14.

8.         Kryminalnyi kodeks Frantsuzkoi respubliky / pid. red. V.L. Menchynskoho. Pereklad na ukrainsku movu K.I. Mazurenko. K.: OVK, 2017. 348 s.

9.         Lykhova S. Ya., Kochnieva A. O. Kryminalna vidpovidalnist za zdiisnennia profesiinoi diialnosti chlenom ekipazhu povitrianoho transportu v stani spianinnia. Yurydychnyi visnyk. Povitriane i kosmichne pravo.  2013.  № 1.  S. 145-148.

10.       Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar Kryminalnoho kodeksu Ukrainy / za red. M.I. Melnyka, M. I. Khavroniuka. 10-te vyd., pererobl. ta dopov.  Kyiv : VD «Dakor», 2018.  1360 s.

11.       Ostrohliad O.V. Osnovni polozhennia kryminalno-pravovoi polityky Ukrainy ta Kryminalnoho prava Ukrainy (Zahalna chastyna) [tekst] : navchalnyi posibnyk (v skhemakh ta vyznachenniakh, praktychni zavdannia). 2-he vyd., pererobl. ta dopov. Ivano-Frankivsk : Symfoniia forte, 2017. 326 s.

12.       Praktyka YeSPL iz zastosuvannia pryntsypu neprytiahnennia do vidpovidalnosti dvichi za odne diiannia – analityka // Elektronnyi resurs. Rezhym dostupu: https://unba.org.ua/news/2636-praktika-espl-iz-zastosuvannya-principu-neprityagnennya-do-vidpovidal-nosti-dvichi-za-odne-diyannya-analitika.html

13.       Statystyka DTP v Ukraini za 2018 rik. URL: http://patrol.police.gov.ua/statystyka/

14.       Khavroniuk M.I. Kryminalne zakonodavstvo Ukrainy ta inshykh derzhav kontynentalnoi Yevropy: porivnialnyi analiz, problemy harmonizatsii. Monohrafiia.  K.: Yurystkonsult, 2006.  1048 s.

15.       Shtrafy za vchynennia administratyvnykh pravoporushen, peredbachenykh st.130 KUpAP za 9 misiatsiv 2017 roku. URL: https://mvs.gov.ua/ua/infographic/nacionalna_policiya/SHtrafi_za_vchinennya_administrativnih_pravoporushen_peredbachenih_st130_KUpAP_za_9_misyaciv_2017_ro.htm