Ilyn L., Kaleniuk O., Havretska M. Principle of historism in law and legal research

DOI: 10.33098/2078-6670.2022.13.25.54-60

Purpose. The purpose of the publication is to highlight the main approaches to understanding the meaning of historicism or the principle of historicism, as well as to determine its role in law in general and historical and legal research in particular. Method. The methodological basis of the study was a set of general scientific, special scientific and historical methods, as well as the principles of historicism and objectivity. Results. It is established that the dreamer of the classical concept of historicism was a German scientist of the XVIII century. F. Schlegel, who proposed to abandon the then established approach that all historical processes in a particular field of science took place consistently and typically, but pointed out that everything depends on the «personality» that influences the process or carries it out, or social or other circumstances in which this process develops. Well-known Ukrainian scholars who developed the theoretical content of the principle of historicism were M. Kovalevsky and S. Dnistryansky. The authors of the publication propose to consider the principle of historicism in a narrow and broad sense. In a narrow sense, the principle of historicism is the process of understanding and interpreting legal norms under the influence of historical, social or political factors. In a broad sense, it is a form of legal research that considers the process of legal decision-making as a product of political, social and historical conditions. Scientific novelty. It is established that the formation of the principle of historicism took place in the middle of the XIX century. and related to the development of the historical school of law. The key to the process of understanding and applying the principle of historicism is determined by the objective appeal to the natural social, political, economic and even cultural processes that influenced the law in a particular historical epoch. The role of the scientist in this process should not be limited to the presentation of material on the basis of a chronological approach, just as one should not associate the principle of historicism with the principle of historicism. It has been established that in modern Ukrainian legal science there is a departure from Soviet ideologues, who associated the principle of historicism with the principle of partisanship and gave it exceptional dialectical features. Practical significance. The results of the research can be used in further historical and legal research and theoretical and legal research.

Key words: historicism, the principle of historicism, law, legal science, research methodology, principles of research.

References

1. Bajtin, M.I. (2001). Sushhnost’ prava (Sovremennoe normativnoe pravoponimanie na grani dvuh vekov) [The essence of law (Modern normative legal understanding on the verge of two centuries)]. Saratov: SGAP, 416 p. (in Ukrainian)
2. Dnistrianskyi, S. S. (1923). Zahalna nauka prava i polityky [General science of law and politics]. (Vol. 1). Praha: Derzhavna drukarnia u Prazi, 400 p. (in Ukrainian)
3. Kovalevskij, M. M. (1880). Istoriko-sravnitel’nyj metod v jurisprudencii i priemy izuchenija istorii prava [Historical-comparative method in jurisprudence and methods of studying the history of law]. Moskva: Tipografija F. B. Millera, 74 p. (in Russian)
4. Kozynets, O., Mendzhul, K. (2020). Istorychna shkola prava: zahalna kharakterystyka i predstavnyky [Historical school of law: general characteristics and representatives]. Jurnalul juridic national: teorie şi practică, 1, pp. 15-18. (in Ukrainian)
5. Muzyka, I. V. (2012). Pryntsyp istoryzmu u tsaryni doslidzhen vitchyznianoi sotsiolohii prava kintsia XIX – pochatku XX stolittia [The principle of historicism in the field of research of domestic sociology of law of the late nineteenth – early twentieth century]. Almanakh prava, 3, pp. 239–243. (in Ukrainian)
6. Muzychenko, P. P. (2000). Istoriia derzhavy i prava Ukrainy [History of the state and law of Ukraine]. K., 264 p. (in Ukrainian)
7. Romashkin, S. V. (2009). Idei istorychnoi shkoly prava v stanovlenni yurydychnoi hermenevtyky [Ideas of the historical school of law in the formation of legal hermeneutics]. Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava [Current issues of state and law], 50, pp. 97–102. (in Ukrainian)
8. Sadykov, F. B. (1985). Edinstvo principov istorizma i partijnosti v nauke [The unity of the principles of historicism and partisanship in science]. Princip istorizma v nauke. Mezhvuzovskij nauchnyj sbornik. Ufa: Izd-vo Bashkirskogo un-ta, pp. 3-17. (in Russian)
9. Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy [Glossary of Ukrainian language]. Retrived from: https://cutt.ly/fJbUBaL. (in Ukrainian)
10. Stelmakh, S. P. (2005). Istoryzm [Historicism]. Entsyklopediia istorii Ukrainy [Encyclopedia of History of Ukraine]: Vol. 3: E-Y / Redkol.: V. A. Smolii (holova) ta in. NAN Ukrainy. Instytut istorii Ukrainy. K.: V-vo «Naukova dumka», 672 p. Retrived from: http://www.history.org.ua/?termin=Istoryzm (in Ukrainian)
11. Terzi, O. S., Arakelian, H. A. (2012). Formuvannia istorychnoi shkoly prava [Formation of the historical school of law]. Nauka. Relihiia. Suspilstvo, 3, pp. 28-31. (in Ukrainian)
12. Shynkaruk,V. I. (Ed.). (2002). Filosofskyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk: entsyklopedyia [Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary: encyclopedia] / NAN Ukrainy, In-t filosofii im. H. S. Skovorody. Kyiv: Abrys, 742 p. (in Ukrainian)
13. Balkin, J., Levinson, S. Legal Historicism and Legal Academics: The Roles of Law Professors in the Wake of Bush v. Gore. Retrived from: https://jackbalkin.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/legalhist.pdf. (in English)