Khodak S. Abuse of interest in family law

DOI: 10.33098/2078-6670.2022.13.25.172-183

Purpose. The aim of the research is to solve the scientific task of doctrinal development of regulation of interests in family law, to determine the criteria for building a hierarchy of interests in family and family law, to investigate the relationship between private and public interests in family law and to consider issues of abuse of family interests. Methodology. Among the philosophical, general and special scientific methods used are such as: logical-semantic method for in-depth clarification of the criteria for the division of interests in family law, formal-logical and system-structural methods used in making judgments, analyzing the content of current family law. legislation on the basis of which the legal regulation of the construction of interest in family law. The scientific novelty is that the article improves the concept of independence of interest from subjective family law and the criteria for their delimitation, which is based on the approach that interest is a prerequisite for the emergence of subjective family law, in the absence of the right to demand appropriate behavior from others persons with no specific legal obligations. It is stated that the balance of interests of each individual family member is formed in accordance with the principle of equality, which is inherent in family law, taking into account the priority interests of individual family members (children, pregnant women, disabled, etc.). The hierarchy of interests in the family and their dynamic nature have been further developed.Attention is paid to the study of the category of “abuse of rights”, as well as the impact of interest on it. Results. The author investigates the connection between public and private interests and, accordingly, the exclusion of the possibility of abuse of state interests in relation to the interests of other subjects of family law. When these interests collide, the priority of the interests of society can take place only if the interests of the individual are ensured, which is achieved by legislative establishment of maximum guarantees for citizens, which exclude the possibility of abuse of their rights. Practical significance. The results of the study can be used in lawmaking to improve legislation in the field of legal regulation of the category of interest; in the educational process – in the development of textbooks, teaching materials in the discipline “Family Law of Ukraine”.

Key words: interest, private interests, public interests, abuse of rights, abuse of interest, interest, subjective law.

References

1.     Shestopalova, L. (2019). Poniattia «zlovzhyvannia» v zakonodavstvi Ukrainy [The concept of “abuse” in the legislation of Ukraine]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo, 9, pp. 186-192. Avaliabe at: file:///C:/Users/admin/Desktop/%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%82%D1%8F%20%D1%96%20%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%B0%20%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%BF%D1%96%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%82%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B0%202/32.pdf (accessed 26 May 2022). (in Ukrainian)

2.    Muranov, A.Y. (1999). The problem of “circumvention of the law” in substantive and conflict law: PhD diss. Moskva, 272 p. (in Russian)

3.    Riasentsev, V. A. (1962). Uslovyia y yurydycheskye posledstvyia otkaza v zashchyte hrazhdanskykh prav [Conditions and legal consequences of denial of civil rights protection]. Sovetskaia yustytsyia, 9, pp. 8–9. (in Russian)

4.    Baru, M.Y. (1958). St. 1 Hrazhdanskoho kodeksa [Art. 1 of the Civil Code]. Sovetskoe hosudarstvo y pravo, 12, pp. 117–120. (in Russian)

5.    Hrybanov, V.P. (2001). Osushchestvlenye y zashchyta hrazhdanskykh prav [Exercise and protection of civil rights]. Yzd. 2-e, stereotyp. M: Statut, 411 p. (in Russian)

6.    Skakun, O.F. (2001). Teoriia derzhavy i prava [Theory of power and law]. Kharkiv: Konsum, 656 p. (in Ukrainian)

7.    Aharkov, M.M.(1946). Problema zloupotrebleniya pravom v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave [The problem of abuse of law in Soviet civil law]. Izvestiya AN SSSR. Otdelenie ekonomiki i prava, 6, pp. 401–464. (in Russian)

8.    Hubar, O. S. (2013). Inadmissibility of abuse by law in the civil law of Ukraine: PhD diss. Kyiv, 200 p . (in Ukrainian)

9.    Onishchuk, O. (2019). Poniattia ta oznaky zlovzhyvannia batkivskymy pravamy [Concepts and signs of abuse of parental rights]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo, 12, pp. 56-61. Avaliabe at: http://pgp-journal.kiev.ua/archive/2019/12/12.pdf (accessed 26 May 2022). (in Ukrainian)

10.  Reshetnyk, Ye. (2013). Poniattia subiektyvnoho simeinoho interesu ta zahalni zasady yoho sudovoho zakhystu [The notion of a subjective family interest and general principles of its protection in courts of justice]. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Yurydychni nauky, 4(98), pp. 84-86. (in Ukrainian)

11.   Il’ina, O.YU. (2007). Problemy interesa v semejnom prave Rossijskoj Federacii [Problems of interest in the family law of the Russian Federation]. Moskva: Gorodec,  192 p. (in Russian)

12.   Pokrovskij, I.A. (2001). Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava [The main problems of civil law]. 3-e izd. M., 348 p. (in Russian)

13.   Matuzov, N.Y. (1999). O prave v ob”ektivnom i sub”ektivnom smysle: gnoseologicheskij aspekt [On Law in the Objective and Subjective Sense: Gnoseological Aspect]. Pravovedenie, 4, pp. 125-133 (in Russian)

14.  Resolution of the Supreme Court in the case №363/3907/16- ts (2019, March 20). Avaliabe at: http://iplex.com.ua/doc.php?regnum=80783093&red=1000035d3ee98df08e9e19fa0301c1122e84da&d=5  (in Ukrainian)

15.   Case № 520/13963/17. Avaliabe at: https://youcontrol.com.ua/catalog/court-document/88435382/ (in Ukrainian)

16.  Resolution of the Supreme Court  in the case № 495/2106/17 (2019, June 6.). Avaliabe at: https://protocol.ua/ru/postanova_ktss_vp_vid_06_06_2019_roku_u_spravi_495_2106_17/ (in Ukrainian)

17.   Resolution of the Supreme Court  in the case № 215/4452/16-ts (2019, March 18). Avaliabe at : https://protocol.ua/ua/vs_ktss_prezumptsiya_na_korist_materi_v_spravah_shchodo_ditey_ne_pidtverdguetsya_na_rivni_oon_ne_vidpovidae_pozitsii_radi_evropi_ta_ne_viplivae_z_deklaratsii_abo_pretsedentnoi_praktiki_espl_(vs_ktss_sprava_215_4452_16_ts_18_03_19)/ (in Ukrainian)

18.  Family Code of Ukraine. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR). 2002, 21-22, p.135. Avaliabe at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2947-14#Text (in Ukrainian)

19.  On state aid to families with children: Law of Ukraine № 2811-KhII (1992, November 21) (red. vid 12. 06. 2009 na pidstavi 1390-17). Avaliabe at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2402-14#Text (in Ukrainian)

20.  On combating domestic violence: Law of Ukraine. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady (VVR). 2018. № 5. S.35. (in Ukrainian)

21.   Hehel, H. V. F. (1990). Filosofiya prava. M.: Mysl, 269 p. (in Russian)

22.  Truba, V. I. (2010). Pro haluzevu nalezhnist simeinykh pravovidnosyn [About branch affiliation of family legal relations]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V.N. Karazina Seriia: Pravo. Spetsialnyi vypusk, 929, pp. 404-407. (in Ukrainian)

23.  Babetska, I.Ia., Khodak, S.M. (2018). Pryvatni i publichni interesy yak kryterii vyznachennia predmetu haluzi simeinoho prava [Private and public interests as a criterion for determining the subject of family law]. Teoretyko-prykladni problemy pravovoho rehuliuvannia v Ukraini. Rehionalna naukovo-praktychna konferentsiia. (m.Lviv, 14 hrudnia 2018roku). Lviv, pp. 241-244. (in Ukrainian)

24.  Shershenevich, G.F. (1995). Obshchaya teoriya prava: v 2-h t. [General Theory of Law]. (Vol. 1-2). M.: Izd-vo «Yuridicheskij kolledzh MGU», 805 c. (in Russian)