Issue № 13(25)
DOI: 10.33098/2078-6670.2022.13.25.91-97 Zavhorodnii V. The concept of the functions of court judgments of the Council of Europe
Zavhorodnii V. The concept of the functions of court judgments of the Council of Europe
Purpose. The aim of the article is to clarify the characteristic features inherent in the functions of Court judgments of Council of Europe and to formulate on this basis the definition of the concept of the same name. Methodology. The theoretical tools of the study were: universal epistemological principles of cognition, complex, dialectical, axiological approaches, general scientific and special scientific methods of cognition. In particular, the following methods of scientific research were used during the research: analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, structural, systemic, technical-dogmatic. Results. As a result of the study it was established that the functions of Court judgments of Council of Europe are the main areas of influence of the European Court of Human Rights on the consciousness and conduct of legal entities to guarantee convention rights and fundamental human freedoms under the jurisdiction of a State party to the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and fundamental freedoms. Scientific novelty. For the first time, the paper substantiates the definition and identifies the characteristic features of the functions of Court judgments of Council of Europe as legal acts that are adopted on the merits and have a dual legal nature. Practical significance. The results of the study can be used for further scientific research in this area, as well as in the law enforcement activities of entities authorized to implement the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the national legal order of Ukraine.
Key words: functions of legal acts, functions of judicial acts, functions of court decisions, functions of judicial authorities, functions of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.
References
1. Kivlenok, T. V. (2009). Funkcii atipichnyh pravovyh aktov [Functions of atypical legal acts]. State power and local self-government: a practical and informational journal. № 12. Pp. 3-5. (in Russian)
2. Alekseev, S. S. (1982). Obshchaya teoriya prava [General theory of law]. (Vol. II). Moscow: Legal Literature, 360 p. (in Russian)
3. Korolkov, P. A. (2011). Influence of the practice of the European Court of Human Rights in the field of interpretation and application of conventional criminal procedural norms on the development of international law and Russian legislation: PhD thesis abstract dis.. Moscow, 27 p. (in Russian)
4. Galkina, O. V. (2015). Functional analysis of legal acts. URL: http://izron.ru/articles/izvoprosov-okhvatyvaemykh-problemoy-sudebnykh-resheniy-vazhneyshee-teoreticheskoe-iprakticheskoe-z/sektsiya-1-teoriya-i-istoriya-prava-i-gosudarstva-istoriya-ucheniy-o-prave-igosudarstve-spetsialnos/funktsionalnyy-analiz-pravovykh-aktov (in Russian)
5. Karabekov, M. M. (2010). Legal acts as a means of formation and implementation of legal policy : general theoretical aspect: PhD thesis abstract. Krasnodar, 31 p. (in Russian)
6. Shopina, O. V. (2002). The system of legal acts in modern Russia : problems of theory: PhD diss. Saratov. 220 p. (in Russian)
7. Makarova, L. R. (2019). Tlumachennia katehorii «funktsii pravovykh aktiv» u zahalnii teorii prava [Interpretation of the category «functions of legal acts» in the general theory of law]. Visegrad Journal on Human Rights, № 3, vol. 1, pp. 165-169. (in Ukrainian)
8. Semikin, D. S. (2012). Celi i funkcii sudebnyh aktov [Purposes and functions of judicial acts]. Law and management. XXI century, 2 (23), pp. 77-82. (in Russian)
9. Molodkin, N. E. (2005) Functions of judicial acts in legal regulation: PhD thesis abstract. Moscow, 22 p. (in Russian)
10. Vasiliev, S. V. (2010). Civil process: a course of lectures. Kharkov: Espada, Retrived from: http://jurfak.univer.kharkov.ua/kafedry/kaf_civil-prav/lekc_cpd/kurs.pdf (in Russian)
11. Zavadskaya, L. N. (1982). Realizaciya sudebnyh reshenij. Teoreticheskie aspekty [Implementation of judgments. Theoretical aspects]. Moscow: Nauka, 141 p. (in Russian)
12. Tuzov, N. A. (2008). Vyrazhenie funkcij organov sudebnoj vlasti v sudebnyh aktah [Expression of the functions of the judicial authorities in judicial acts. Journal of Russian Law, 10, pp. 95-104. (in Russian)
13. Metlova, I. S. (2007). Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in the system of sources of Russian law: PhD diss. Moscow, 190 p. (in Russian)