Barikova A. Integrative legal order regarding discretion in the application of financial provisions of law

DOI: 10.33098/2078-6670.2023.15.27.1.128-134

Purpose. The purpose of the article is to reveal the essence of the integration dimension of the exercise of discretion when applying the financial provisions of law. Methodology. The methodology includes a comprehensive analysis and generalization of the available scientific and theoretical material and the formulation of relevant conclusions and recommendations. The following methods of scientific knowledge have been used during the research: logical-semantic, functional, system-structural, formal-legal, comparative-legal. Results. It has been determined that the integration legal order regarding discretion when applying the financial provisions of law is an interstate integrated system-superstructure of supranational principles, norms and institutions, which are formed through the interaction of national legal orders and have an organizational orientation of the tools for their implementation. Originality. In the context of the integration legal order, the mechanism of exercising discretion when applying the financial provisions of law has been established as functional elements, legal relations and tools that determine and limit the rules of behaviour of law enforcers in order to achieve the goals and objectives of the rule of law, ensuring the lawful behaviour of subjects and the balance of public and private interests when making a choice between alternatives and making a legitimate and optimal decision. A promising direction of the development of such a system is the practical implementation of the concept of logical formalization of the institution of such discretion regarding the typical order (algorithm) of observing the limits of discretion: how and on the basis of which factors discretion is to be exercised, criteria and sequence of analysis; comparison of facts with the rule of law to find coincidences; evaluations according to criteria, interpretation, justification; formation of conclusions; optional indication of similar legal positions; finalizing what decision to make within discretion. Practical significance. The results of the research could be used in law-making and law-enforcement activities to establish the limits of discretion when applying the financial provisions of law.

Key words: Christianity, social legal order, integration, universal legal order, supranational legal order, national legal order, legal system.

References

1. Pisov, M. (2016). Do pytannia «intehratsiinyi pravovyi poriadok»: poniattia, znachennia ta spivvidnoshennia z mizhnarodnym pravoporiadkom [On the ‘integrative legal order’ issue: concept, meaning and relationship with the international legal order]. Jurnalul juridic national: teorie şi practică, 1/2(17), 14–19. (in Ukrainian)

2. Kryzhanivskyi, A.F. (2009). Pravovyi poriadok v Ukraini: vytoky, kontseptualni zasady, infrastruktura [Legal order in Ukraine: origins, conceptual foundations, infrastructure]. Odesa: Feniks. (in Ukrainian)

3. Arabadzhy, N.B. (2015). Sotsialnyi zriz vlasnoi tsinnosti pravovoho poriadku [The social slice regarding the value of the legal order]. Current Problems of State and Law, 75, 50–55. (in Ukrainian)

4. Rabinovich, P.M. (2006). Socialisticheskoe pravo kak cennost’ [Socialist law as a value]. Odesa: Yuryd. lit. (in Russian)

5. Lutskyi, I.M. (2010). Khrystyianstvo yak svitohliadne dzherelo ukrainskoi derzhavy i prava [Christianity as a worldview source of the Ukrainian state and law]. Ivano-Frankivsk: Misto NV. (in Ukrainian)

6. Berman, H.J. (1983). The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. (in English)

7. Melenko, S.H. (2014). Ancient Greek philosophy of law as a worldview source of Ukrainian philosophical and legal thought and law: Dr. habil. thesis abstract. Kyiv: National Academy of Internal Affairs. (in Ukrainian)

8. Tkachuk, I.D. (2020). Metodolohiia doslidzhennia vplyvu khrystyianskykh tsinnostei na formuvannia pravovoi kultury Ukrainy [Research methodology of the influence of Christian values on the formation of the legal culture of Ukraine]. Philosophical and methodological Problems of law, 1 (19), 58–63. (in Ukrainian)

9. Lutskyi, I. (2014). Khrystyianstvo yak svitohliadne dzherelo ukrainskoi derzhavy y prava [Christianity as an ideological source of the Ukrainian state and law]. Bulletin of the Precarpathian University, 8, 108–113. (in Ukrainian)

10. Luts, L.A. (2003). Yevropeiski mizhderzhavni pravovi systemy ta problemy intehratsii z nymy pravovoi systemy Ukrainy (teoretychni aspekty) [European interstate legal systems and issues of integration with the latter of the legal system of Ukraine (theoretical aspects)]. Kyiv: Koretsky Institute of State and Law of National Academy of Science of Ukraine. (in Ukrainian)

11. Kryzhanivskyi, A.F. (2005). Pravoporiadok v intehratsiinykh pravovykh systemakh [Law and order in integration legal systems]. Current Problems of State and Law, 25, 83–88. (in Ukrainian)

12. Butkevych, V.H. (2002). Mizhnarodne pravo. Osnovy teorii [International law. Basics of the theory]. Kyiv: Lybid. (in Ukrainian)

13. Dyminska O.Iu. (2016). Osoblyvosti Yevropeiskoho pravoporiadku v systemi mizhnarodnykh, rehionalnykh ta natsionalnykh pravoporiadkiv [Peculiarities of the European legal order in the system of international, regional and national legal orders]. Comparative and analytical law, 3, 218–220. (in Ukrainian)

14. Birkinshaw, P., Varney, M. (2010). The European Union Legal Order After Lisbon. Austin: Kluwer Law International. (in English)

15. Perederii, O.S. (2021). Pravoporiadok Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu: sutnisni osoblyvosti ta vplyv na transformatsiiu pravoporiadku Ukrainy [The legal order of the European Union: essential features and influence on the transformation of the legal order of Ukraine]. Scientific Journal “Chronicles of KUL”, 1, 50–56. (in Ukrainian)

16. Muraviov, V. (2012). Zahalni pryntsypy pravoporiadku Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu [General principles of the legal order of the European Union]. European Law, 2–4, 245–260. (in Ukrainian)

17. Przybojewsk, J. Law and administration. (2015). Post-Soviet Europe journal of Kolegium Jagiellonskie Torunska Szkola Wyzsza, II, 51 p. (in English)

18. Resolution of the Supreme Court in the case no. 320/5562/18. (2021, September 15). Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/99686882 (accessed 17 January 2023). (in Ukrainian)

19. Resolution of the Supreme Court in the case no. 320/5563/18. (2021, November 4). Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/100824070 (accessed 17 January 2023). (in Ukrainian)

20. Resolution of the Supreme Court in the case no. 460/2786/19. (2021, November 24). Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/101332169 (accessed 17 January 2023). (in Ukrainian)

21. Resolution of the Supreme Court in the case no. 640/110/20. (2022, February 22). Available at: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/103521490 (accessed 17 January 2023). (in Ukrainian)