Mahnovskyi I. General theoretical aspects of understanding the essence of legal errors in national jurisprudence

DOI: 10.33098/2078-6670.2023.15.27.2.53-61

Purpose. The aim of the work is to analyze the essence of legal errors in national jurisprudence in a general theoretical aspect, based on the realities and challenges of today. Methodology. The methodology includes a comprehensive analysis and generalization of available scientific and theoretical material and the formulation of relevant conclusions and recommendations. The following methods of scientific reseach have been implemented: terminological, logical-semantic, functional, system-structural, logical-normative. Results. In the process of research,it was recognized that legal errors are complex, multifaceted, negative phenomena, with a certain disguise, with existing deviations and possible illegal consequences, which contradict the real, objective reality in domestic legal practice, which are caused by the activities of the relevant subjects of individual law nature at their own discretion, when performing their functional duties. Therefore, one of the important tasks is to reveal the legal nature and essence of a legal error, to present its deep, meaningful characteristics, to understand the processes of its formation and formation, and therefore, to develop ways of its timely detection, prevention and elimination. Originality.In the process of research, it was established that legal errors in their totality are distinguished by their complexity and contradictions, are a negative element of legal reality with existing deviations, as a possible illegal result of the individual activity of an authorized subject of law based on his own discretion. Practical significance. The results of the research can be used in law-making and law-enforcement activities during the development of proposals for improving the mechanism of its timely detection, prevention and elimination.

Key words: legal error, national legislation, national jurisprudence, law-making activity, normative-legal act, legal reality.

References

1. Ryndiuk, V. I. (2012). Pravotvorchi pomylky: poniattia, vydy, sposoby yikh poperedzhennia, vyiavlennia ta vypravlennia [Law-making errors: concept, types, ways to prevent, detect and correct them]. Biuleten Ministerstva yustytsii Ukrainy, 8, 21–27. (in Ukrainian)

2. Yevhrafova, Ye. P. (2016). Praktyka vypravlennia zakonotvorchykh pomylok [Practice of Correction of Legislative Errors]. Chasopys tsyvilnoho i kryminalnoho sudochynstva, 2, 107–120. (in Ukrainian)

3. Kalienichenko, L. I. (2014). Pomylka yak katehoriia pravoznavstva [Error as a category of jurisprudence]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina. Seriia «Pravo»: zb. nauk. pr. Kharkiv, 17, 31–33. (in Ukrainian)

4. Lanovenko, I. P. (2002). Pomylka u pravi (pravova pomylka) [Error in law (legal error)]. Yurydychna entsyklopediia  / redkol. Yu. S. Shemshuchenko (holov.) ta in. (Vol. 4: N–P). Kyiv. (in Ukrainian)

5. Bilodid, I. K. (Ed.). (1976). Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy [Dictionary of the Ukrainian language]. (Vol. 7). Kyiv: Nauk. dumka. (in Ukrainian)

6. Busel, V. T. (Ed.). (2009). Velykyi tlumachnyi slovnyk suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy [A large explanatory dictionary of the modern Ukrainian language]. Kyiv; Irpin: Perun. (in Ukrainian)

7. Bylia, I. O. (2004). Theoretical basis for the use of rulemaking techniques: PhD thesis abstract. Kharkiv. (in Ukrainian)

8. Shevchuk, I. I. (2015). Law-making errors in Ukrainian legislation: general theoretical aspects: PhD thesis abstract. Lviv. (in Ukrainian)

9. Onishchenko, N. M. (2016). Do pytannia pro doktrynalni yurydychni pomylky: pryroda ta shliakhy podolannia [As for Issue of Doctrinal Error: Nature and Ways to Overcome]. Chasopys tsyvilnoho i kryminalnoho sudochynstva, 2, 75–84. (in Ukrainian)

10. Dziubak, N. M. (2014). Pomylka yak obiekt naukovoho vyvchennia [Error as an object of scientific study]. Naukovi pratsi Kamianets-Podilskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Ohiienka. Filolohichni nauky : zb. nauk. pr. Kamianets-Podilsk, 35, 9–11. (in Ukrainian)

11. Nastavnyi, B. E. (2018). Pomylka yak yurydychne poniattia: teoretyko-pravovi aspekty [Mistakes as a legal concept: theoretical and legal aspects]. Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava, 4, 69–73. (in Ukrainian)

12. Kryzhanovskyi, A. F. (2009). The Legal Order of Sovereign Ukraine: Formation and Tendencies of the Development (General Theoretical Reseaech): Doctor of Science in Law diss. (in Ukrainian)

13. Minevych, O. I. (2021). Concept and types of legal errors: general theoretical research: PhD  diss. Odesa. (in Ukrainian)

14. Vanchak, M. L. (2011). Poniattia zakonotvorchykh pomylok u kryminalnomu pravi [The Concept of Legislative Errors in Criminal Law]. Naukovyi visnyk Lvivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav. Seriia yurydychna: zb. nauk. pr. Lviv, 3, 231–239. (in Ukrainian)

15. Sirokha, D. I. (2019). Problemy usunennia nedolikiv pravovoho rehuliuvannia normotvorchosti subiektiv trudovoho prava [Problems of eliminating the shortcomings of the legal regulation of the rulemaking of subjects of labor law]. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Ser.: Yurysprudentsiia: zb. nauk. pr. Odesa,  42, vol 1, 96–99. (in Ukrainian)

16. Pasichna, I.O. (2019). Zakonotvorchist, normotvorchist ta pravorealizatsiia: navchalnyi posibnyk z dystsypliny dlia studentiv spetsialnosti 281 Publichne upravlinnia ta administruvannia [Legislation, rule-making and enforcement]. Poltava: Poltavskyi natsionalnyi tekhnichnyi universytet imeni Yuriia Kondratiuka. (in Ukrainian)

17. Kostiuk, M. L. (2017). Definityvni problemy normotvorchosti [Definitional problems of creation]. Aktualni problemy vitchyznianoi yurysprudentsii. Spetsvypusk, 2, 3–7. (in Ukrainian)

18. Kalienichenko, L. I. (2012). Naukovi pidkhody do vyznachennia poniattia pravozastosovnoi pomylky v zahalnoteoretychnii yurysprudentsii [Cientific approaches to the concept definition of the concept of law enforcement mistake in general and theoretical jurisprudence]. Pravo i Bezpeka, 4, 8–12. (in Ukrainian)

19. Prus, E. U. (2013). Poperedzhennia pravozastosovchykh pomylok [Prevent³on enforcement m³stakes]. Naukovi pratsi Natsionalnoho universytetu «Odeska yurydychna akademiia»: zb. nauk. pr. Odesa, vol. XIII, 581–587. (in Ukrainian)

20. Shevchuk, I. I. (2014). Osnovni sposoby poperedzhennia ta podolannia pravotvorchykh pomylok u zakonodavstvi Ukrainy [The Main Ways to Prevent and Overcome the Law-Making Mistakes in the Legislation of Ukraine]. Universytetski naukovi zapysky, 3, 42–47. (in Ukrainian)